2015Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Coevolution in mutualisms

Bruce Anderson

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

While coevolution may have dramatically shaped our world, it has been extremely difficult to demonstrate because the signatures of coevolution are exceptionally diverse and they are seldom exclusive to coevolutionary processes. This chapter gives a brief history of how coevolution has been studied in mutualistic and antagonistic relationships and then suggests methods which can be used to demonstrate coevolution. There are several different potential mechanisms behind the coevolutionary process and these mechanisms are likely to differ between antagonisms and mutualisms as well as from one mutualism to another. Consequently it may be expected that the signatures of coevolution may differ depending on the exact mechanisms behind the process. It is suggested how to recognize those signatures and why the phenotypes and phylogenies of interacting species may sometimes match or mismatch, and how coevolution can cause patterns of trait diversification and convergence. While patterns associated with coevolution cannot be used to prove coevolution on their own, it is argued, they remain very useful tools to test predictions about how different kinds of coevolution and relationships may affect the phenotypic and genotypic evolution of interacting species.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While coevolution may have dramatically shaped our world, it has been extremely difficult to demonstrate because the signatures of coevolution are exceptionally diverse and they are seldom exclusive to coevolutionary processes. This chapter gives a brief history of how coevolution has been studied in mutualistic and antagonistic relationships and then suggests methods which can be used to demonstrate coevolution. There are several different potential mechanisms behind the coevolutionary process and these mechanisms are likely to differ between antagonisms and mutualisms as well as from one mutualism to another. Consequently it may be expected that the signatures of coevolution may differ depending on the exact mechanisms behind the process. It is suggested how to recognize those signatures and why the phenotypes and phylogenies of interacting species may sometimes match or mismatch, and how coevolution can cause patterns of trait diversification and convergence. While patterns associated with coevolution cannot be used to prove coevolution on their own, it is argued, they remain very useful tools to test predictions about how different kinds of coevolution and relationships may affect the phenotypic and genotypic evolution of interacting species.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While coevolution may have dramatically shaped our world, it has been extremely difficult to demonstrate because the signatures of coevolution are exceptionally diverse and they are seldom exclusive to coevolutionary processes. This chapter gives a brief history of how coevolution has been studied in mutualistic and antagonistic relationships and then suggests methods which can be used to demonstrate coevolution. There are several different potential mechanisms behind the coevolutionary process and these mechanisms are likely to differ between antagonisms and mutualisms as well as from one mutualism to another. Consequently it may be expected that the signatures of coevolution may differ depending on the exact mechanisms behind the process. It is suggested how to recognize those signatures and why the phenotypes and phylogenies of interacting species may sometimes match or mismatch, and how coevolution can cause patterns of trait diversification and convergence. While patterns associated with coevolution cannot be used to prove coevolution on their own, it is argued, they remain very useful tools to test predictions about how different kinds of coevolution and relationships may affect the phenotypic and genotypic evolution of interacting species.

Key concepts: Coevolution, Mutualism (biology), Evolutionary biology, Trait, Biology, Antagonistic Coevolution, Diversification (marketing strategy), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coevolution in mutualisms — Research Paper | ScholarLens