1985Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Development Anthropology and the Study of Poverty: A Note

John Robert Clammer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

One of the key areas of concern to development anthropologists has been the study of poverty: indeed to some people this subject is almost synonymous with development anthropology. The way the problem is seen, however, has undergone considerable changes. As a major focus of interest poverty largely dates from the works of Oscar Lewis and the subsequent ‘culture of poverty’ debate. Essentially this revolved around the legitimacy of studying poverty as, or as if it were, a culture — an integrated, self-sustaining and self-regulating lifestyle — without attention to its causes and its eradication. As a consequence of this debate interest switched to a great extent to, on the one hand, a more refined conceptualisation of the problem itself (for example the emergence of the idea of the ‘informal sector’), and on the other, the development of more rigorous explanatory models — including structural ones, Marxist theories of exploitation and alienation, and a general decline in individualist, psychological or cultural explanations of poverty. The current trend in development anthropology is undoubtedly towards an action-oriented approach: that is, seeing poverty not as something to be merely studied, but as a social evil to be eradicated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the key areas of concern to development anthropologists has been the study of poverty: indeed to some people this subject is almost synonymous with development anthropology. The way the problem is seen, however, has undergone considerable changes. As a major focus of interest poverty largely dates from the works of Oscar Lewis and the subsequent ‘culture of poverty’ debate. Essentially this revolved around the legitimacy of studying poverty as, or as if it were, a culture — an integrated, self-sustaining and self-regulating lifestyle — without attention to its causes and its eradication. As a consequence of this debate interest switched to a great extent to, on the one hand, a more refined conceptualisation of the problem itself (for example the emergence of the idea of the ‘informal sector’), and on the other, the development of more rigorous explanatory models — including structural ones, Marxist theories of exploitation and alienation, and a general decline in individualist, psychological or cultural explanations of poverty. The current trend in development anthropology is undoubtedly towards an action-oriented approach: that is, seeing poverty not as something to be merely studied, but as a social evil to be eradicated.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the key areas of concern to development anthropologists has been the study of poverty: indeed to some people this subject is almost synonymous with development anthropology. The way the problem is seen, however, has undergone considerable changes. As a major focus of interest poverty largely dates from the works of Oscar Lewis and the subsequent ‘culture of poverty’ debate. Essentially this revolved around the legitimacy of studying poverty as, or as if it were, a culture — an integrated, self-sustaining and self-regulating lifestyle — without attention to its causes and its eradication. As a consequence of this debate interest switched to a great extent to, on the one hand, a more refined conceptualisation of the problem itself (for example the emergence of the idea of the ‘informal sector’), and on the other, the development of more rigorous explanatory models — including structural ones, Marxist theories of exploitation and alienation, and a general decline in individualist, psychological or cultural explanations of poverty. The current trend in development anthropology is undoubtedly towards an action-oriented approach: that is, seeing poverty not as something to be merely studied, but as a social evil to be eradicated.

Key concepts: Poverty, Culture of poverty, Alienation, Individualism, Legitimacy, Sociology, Subject (documents), Action (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development Anthropology and the Study of Poverty: A Note — Research Paper | ScholarLens