2014Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Labour Law or the Law of the Labour Market?

Ruth Dukes

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This chapter argues for the continued usefulness of the idea of the labour constitution as a framework for scholarly analysis. It builds, firstly, on a comparison of the scholarship of Sinzheimer and Kahn-Freund with the approach of the ‘law of the labour market’ scholars. It then aims to reassess the old approaches in light of globalization and the many changes implied by that term to production, distribution, finance, and work. Notwithstanding such changes, the framework of the labour constitution is argued to emphasize, still, the critical nature of the link between labour law and democracy. As such, it is argued to frame the subject of labour law in a way that allows for important questions to be asked, and important arguments to be made: questions regarding the consequences for workers of the continuous expansion of markets insulated from democratic control; arguments which re-assert the importance of democracy and worker participation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter argues for the continued usefulness of the idea of the labour constitution as a framework for scholarly analysis. It builds, firstly, on a comparison of the scholarship of Sinzheimer and Kahn-Freund with the approach of the ‘law of the labour market’ scholars. It then aims to reassess the old approaches in light of globalization and the many changes implied by that term to production, distribution, finance, and work. Notwithstanding such changes, the framework of the labour constitution is argued to emphasize, still, the critical nature of the link between labour law and democracy. As such, it is argued to frame the subject of labour law in a way that allows for important questions to be asked, and important arguments to be made: questions regarding the consequences for workers of the continuous expansion of markets insulated from democratic control; arguments which re-assert the importance of democracy and worker participation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter argues for the continued usefulness of the idea of the labour constitution as a framework for scholarly analysis. It builds, firstly, on a comparison of the scholarship of Sinzheimer and Kahn-Freund with the approach of the ‘law of the labour market’ scholars. It then aims to reassess the old approaches in light of globalization and the many changes implied by that term to production, distribution, finance, and work. Notwithstanding such changes, the framework of the labour constitution is argued to emphasize, still, the critical nature of the link between labour law and democracy. As such, it is argued to frame the subject of labour law in a way that allows for important questions to be asked, and important arguments to be made: questions regarding the consequences for workers of the continuous expansion of markets insulated from democratic control; arguments which re-assert the importance of democracy and worker participation.

Key concepts: Labour law, Constitution, Scholarship, Democracy, Subject (documents), Globalization, Work (physics), Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Labour Law or the Law of the Labour Market? — Research Paper | ScholarLens