2016•Technische Universität Dortmund Eldorado (Technische Universität Dortmund)Open access

Leadership and work stress

Mathias Diebig

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This dissertation examines the role the behaviors of leaders play in the context of work stress. Recently, the interrelation between the behavior of the leader and its consequences for followers has received growing attention from researchers as well as practitioners. Yet, important research questions remain unanswered. Therefore, this dissertation combines stress-related antecedents as well as stress-related consequences of leader behaviors in face of the full-range leadership behavior pattern (i.e. laissez-faire, transactional, and transformational leadership) to create an integrative model of leadership and to provide a detailed assessment of potential stress-related outcome variables. The dissertation focuses on the extension of findings on the basis of different, innovative measurement approaches to uncover robust effects between leadership and different stress measures. Further, a mediation model of leadership is examined to enable a better understanding of how leaders influence stress levels of their followers. Combined with the specification of when this influence is particularly strong and when it is not, the dissertation provides an encompassing research model in the field of leadership as well as stress research. Three empirical studies were conducted to shed light into this field of inquiry. In the first study leader stress is taken into account to investigate how leader stress influences leader behavior patterns. In the second and third study follower stress is taken into account to scrutinize which behavioral strategies of leaders have a positive impact on the amount of follower stress and which strategies do not or even have an inverse impact. In study two the daily variability of leadership behaviors is highlighted and in study three an objective indicator of stress measurement is implemented. In summary this dissertation extends existing research on stress-related antecedents as well as consequences of full-range leadership behaviors. The contribution to the field is to identify stress-related preconditions of (transformational) leadership behavior to gain a better understanding of the role stress may play in the genesis of leader behaviors within organizations. At the same time, the dissertation offers important insights into stress-related consequences of (full-range) leadership behaviors. Moreover, mediating mechanisms through the lens of the job demands-resources model were outlined to further specify the relation between leader behaviors and work stress. In sum, results show that stress impairs leaders’ behaviors, which has important consequences on followers’ stress levels (on a subjective as well as objective level of measurement). Taken together, the dissertation helps to close current research gaps and to extend knowledge in the context of stress-related antecedents as well as outcomes of supervisor behaviors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This dissertation examines the role the behaviors of leaders play in the context of work stress. Recently, the interrelation between the behavior of the leader and its consequences for followers has received growing attention from researchers as well as practitioners. Yet, important research questions remain unanswered. Therefore, this dissertation combines stress-related antecedents as well as stress-related consequences of leader behaviors in face of the full-range leadership behavior pattern (i.e. laissez-faire, transactional, and transformational leadership) to create an integrative model of leadership and to provide a detailed assessment of potential stress-related outcome variables. The dissertation focuses on the extension of findings on the basis of different, innovative measurement approaches to uncover robust effects between leadership and different stress measures. Further, a mediation model of leadership is examined to enable a better understanding of how leaders influence stress levels of their followers. Combined with the specification of when this influence is particularly strong and when it is not, the dissertation provides an encompassing research model in the field of leadership as well as stress research. Three empirical studies were conducted to shed light into this field of inquiry. In the first study leader stress is taken into account to investigate how leader stress influences leader behavior patterns. In the second and third study follower stress is taken into account to scrutinize which behavioral strategies of leaders have a positive impact on the amount of follower stress and which strategies do not or even have an inverse impact. In study two the daily variability of leadership behaviors is highlighted and in study three an objective indicator of stress measurement is implemented. In summary this dissertation extends existing research on stress-related antecedents as well as consequences of full-range leadership behaviors. The contribution to the field is to identify stress-related preconditions of (transformational) leadership behavior to gain a better understanding of the role stress may play in the genesis of leader behaviors within organizations. At the same time, the dissertation offers important insights into stress-related consequences of (full-range) leadership behaviors. Moreover, mediating mechanisms through the lens of the job demands-resources model were outlined to further specify the relation between leader behaviors and work stress. In sum, results show that stress impairs leaders’ behaviors, which has important consequences on followers’ stress levels (on a subjective as well as objective level of measurement). Taken together, the dissertation helps to close current research gaps and to extend knowledge in the context of stress-related antecedents as well as outcomes of supervisor behaviors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This dissertation examines the role the behaviors of leaders play in the context of work stress. Recently, the interrelation between the behavior of the leader and its consequences for followers has received growing attention from researchers as well as practitioners. Yet, important research questions remain unanswered. Therefore, this dissertation combines stress-related antecedents as well as stress-related consequences of leader behaviors in face of the full-range leadership behavior pattern (i.e. laissez-faire, transactional, and transformational leadership) to create an integrative model of leadership and to provide a detailed assessment of potential stress-related outcome variables. The dissertation focuses on the extension of findings on the basis of different, innovative measurement approaches to uncover robust effects between leadership and different stress measures. Further, a mediation model of leadership is examined to enable a better understanding of how leaders influence stress levels of their followers. Combined with the specification of when this influence is particularly strong and when it is not, the dissertation provides an encompassing research model in the field of leadership as well as stress research. Three empirical studies were conducted to shed light into this field of inquiry. In the first study leader stress is taken into account to investigate how leader stress influences leader behavior patterns. In the second and third study follower stress is taken into account to scrutinize which behavioral strategies of leaders have a positive impact on the amount of follower stress and which strategies do not or even have an inverse impact. In study two the daily variability of leadership behaviors is highlighted and in study three an objective indicator of stress measurement is implemented. In summary this dissertation extends existing research on stress-related antecedents as well as consequences of full-range leadership behaviors. The contribution to the field is to identify stress-related preconditions of (transformational) leadership behavior to gain a better understanding of the role stress may play in the genesis of leader behaviors within organizations. At the same time, the dissertation offers important insights into stress-related consequences of (full-range) leadership behaviors. Moreover, mediating mechanisms through the lens of the job demands-resources model were outlined to further specify the relation between leader behaviors and work stress. In sum, results show that stress impairs leaders’ behaviors, which has important consequences on followers’ stress levels (on a subjective as well as objective level of measurement). Taken together, the dissertation helps to close current research gaps and to extend knowledge in the context of stress-related antecedents as well as outcomes of supervisor behaviors.

Key concepts: Stress (linguistics), Work (physics), Psychology, Social psychology, Political science, Engineering, Philosophy, Mechanical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Leadership and work stress — Research Paper | ScholarLens