1986Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Inhibition of Dopa-production in Striatal Synaptosomes by the R(−) and the S(+) Enantiomers of Apomorphine

Matthias Bräutigam, B. Kittner, Gabriele Laschinski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The mechanism of the regulation of dopamine (DA) biosynthesis in dopaminergic nerve terminals is still controversial. Most authors agree that extraneuronal DA or other dopaminergic drugs influence tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) via presynaptic autoreceptors. The dopamine agonist R(−)-apomorphine retains its efficiency in blocking DOPA-production in striatal slices or synaptosomes, reinforcing the concept of an autoreceptor-mediated regulation of DOPA-production. However, the antagonism of neuroleptics on the R(−)apomorphine-induced inhibition of DOPA-production in vitro is not very marked. Therefore, Goldstein et al. (1976) suggested that part of the R(−)-apomorphine effect is related to the inhibitory property of its catechol moiety. Apomorphine exists both in R(−)- and S(+)-enantiomeric forms, the catechol moiety being unchanged. While R(−)-apomorphine possesses DA-agonistic activity, S(+)-apomorphine is considered to be a DA-antagonist (Goldman and Kebabian, 1984). Comparison of the effects of both enantiomers on soluble TH-activity and DOPA-production in striatal synaptosomes should, therefore, allow to discriminate an autoreceptor mediated effect on TH from a direct one.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The mechanism of the regulation of dopamine (DA) biosynthesis in dopaminergic nerve terminals is still controversial. Most authors agree that extraneuronal DA or other dopaminergic drugs influence tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) via presynaptic autoreceptors. The dopamine agonist R(−)-apomorphine retains its efficiency in blocking DOPA-production in striatal slices or synaptosomes, reinforcing the concept of an autoreceptor-mediated regulation of DOPA-production. However, the antagonism of neuroleptics on the R(−)apomorphine-induced inhibition of DOPA-production in vitro is not very marked. Therefore, Goldstein et al. (1976) suggested that part of the R(−)-apomorphine effect is related to the inhibitory property of its catechol moiety. Apomorphine exists both in R(−)- and S(+)-enantiomeric forms, the catechol moiety being unchanged. While R(−)-apomorphine possesses DA-agonistic activity, S(+)-apomorphine is considered to be a DA-antagonist (Goldman and Kebabian, 1984). Comparison of the effects of both enantiomers on soluble TH-activity and DOPA-production in striatal synaptosomes should, therefore, allow to discriminate an autoreceptor mediated effect on TH from a direct one.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The mechanism of the regulation of dopamine (DA) biosynthesis in dopaminergic nerve terminals is still controversial. Most authors agree that extraneuronal DA or other dopaminergic drugs influence tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) via presynaptic autoreceptors. The dopamine agonist R(−)-apomorphine retains its efficiency in blocking DOPA-production in striatal slices or synaptosomes, reinforcing the concept of an autoreceptor-mediated regulation of DOPA-production. However, the antagonism of neuroleptics on the R(−)apomorphine-induced inhibition of DOPA-production in vitro is not very marked. Therefore, Goldstein et al. (1976) suggested that part of the R(−)-apomorphine effect is related to the inhibitory property of its catechol moiety. Apomorphine exists both in R(−)- and S(+)-enantiomeric forms, the catechol moiety being unchanged. While R(−)-apomorphine possesses DA-agonistic activity, S(+)-apomorphine is considered to be a DA-antagonist (Goldman and Kebabian, 1984). Comparison of the effects of both enantiomers on soluble TH-activity and DOPA-production in striatal synaptosomes should, therefore, allow to discriminate an autoreceptor mediated effect on TH from a direct one.

Key concepts: Apomorphine, Autoreceptor, Chemistry, Dopamine, Dopaminergic, Agonist, Pharmacology, Enantiomer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Inhibition of Dopa-production in Striatal Synaptosomes by the R(−) and the S(+) Enantiomers of Apomorphine — Research Paper | ScholarLens