2001Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

“I Also am a Man”: Johnson’s Lives and the Gender of the Poet

Linda Zionkowski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In a conversation with Samuel Johnson shortly after the initial volumes of his Lives of the English Poets (1779–81) appeared, James Boswell raised the touchy issue of Johnson’s subordination to the London booksellers who initiated the project: “I asked him if he would [provide a preface] to any dunce’s works, if they should ask him. Johnson. ‘Yes, Sir; and say he was a dunce?’” 1 Johnson’s reply asserts the complete autonomy of his critical judgments, declaring that even the economic concerns of those who financed the Lives would have no effect on the content of his prefaces. Most readers of the Lives agreed that Johnson maintained his intellectual independence, surpassing the work of his predecessors and transforming the “not very extensive or difficult” 2 undertaking into something much more complicated: as Robert Halsband observes, the Lives represented “the culmination of his career as well as the art and craft of literary biography up to that time.”3

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a conversation with Samuel Johnson shortly after the initial volumes of his Lives of the English Poets (1779–81) appeared, James Boswell raised the touchy issue of Johnson’s subordination to the London booksellers who initiated the project: “I asked him if he would [provide a preface] to any dunce’s works, if they should ask him. Johnson. ‘Yes, Sir; and say he was a dunce?’” 1 Johnson’s reply asserts the complete autonomy of his critical judgments, declaring that even the economic concerns of those who financed the Lives would have no effect on the content of his prefaces. Most readers of the Lives agreed that Johnson maintained his intellectual independence, surpassing the work of his predecessors and transforming the “not very extensive or difficult” 2 undertaking into something much more complicated: as Robert Halsband observes, the Lives represented “the culmination of his career as well as the art and craft of literary biography up to that time.”3

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a conversation with Samuel Johnson shortly after the initial volumes of his Lives of the English Poets (1779–81) appeared, James Boswell raised the touchy issue of Johnson’s subordination to the London booksellers who initiated the project: “I asked him if he would [provide a preface] to any dunce’s works, if they should ask him. Johnson. ‘Yes, Sir; and say he was a dunce?’” 1 Johnson’s reply asserts the complete autonomy of his critical judgments, declaring that even the economic concerns of those who financed the Lives would have no effect on the content of his prefaces. Most readers of the Lives agreed that Johnson maintained his intellectual independence, surpassing the work of his predecessors and transforming the “not very extensive or difficult” 2 undertaking into something much more complicated: as Robert Halsband observes, the Lives represented “the culmination of his career as well as the art and craft of literary biography up to that time.”3

Key concepts: Biography, Craft, Conversation, Autonomy, Independence (probability theory), Literature, Art, Subordination (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“I Also am a Man”: Johnson’s Lives and the Gender of the Poet — Research Paper | ScholarLens