2008Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Analgesia for the Renal Colic Patient

Allan B. Wolfson, David H. Newman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM Kidney stones occur in an estimated 5% of the population at any given time. The estimated lifetime risk for the passage of a renal stone is approximately 10%. After having one episode of renal colic, an estimated 50% of individuals will suffer a recurrence. It is not surprising, therefore, that there are more than 1 million visits to U.S. emergency departments (EDs) each year because of renal colic. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT Several studies have assessed the accuracy of the diagnosis of renal colic based on clinical presentation. Although the constellation of flank pain, nausea and vomiting, and hematuria has appeared to be reasonably specific in the classical approach to these patients, more recent investigations have suggested that when computed tomography (CT) scanning of the abdomen and pelvis is performed in the acute setting, important alternate diagnoses are identified relatively frequently. In one study of subjects who were thought by the treating physician to have a 90–100% likelihood of suffering a first episode of renal colic, 17% were found to have alternate significant pathology. It, therefore, seems prudent to consider imaging in the majority of patients with a suspected initial episode of renal colic (Figure 19-1). PAIN CONSIDERATIONS It is believed that the pain of renal colic is largely mediated by the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 in the renal medulla, leading to increased flow through the afferent arterioles and increased renal pelvis pressure. Ureteral smooth muscle spasm may also be a factor.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM Kidney stones occur in an estimated 5% of the population at any given time. The estimated lifetime risk for the passage of a renal stone is approximately 10%. After having one episode of renal colic, an estimated 50% of individuals will suffer a recurrence. It is not surprising, therefore, that there are more than 1 million visits to U.S. emergency departments (EDs) each year because of renal colic. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT Several studies have assessed the accuracy of the diagnosis of renal colic based on clinical presentation. Although the constellation of flank pain, nausea and vomiting, and hematuria has appeared to be reasonably specific in the classical approach to these patients, more recent investigations have suggested that when computed tomography (CT) scanning of the abdomen and pelvis is performed in the acute setting, important alternate diagnoses are identified relatively frequently. In one study of subjects who were thought by the treating physician to have a 90–100% likelihood of suffering a first episode of renal colic, 17% were found to have alternate significant pathology. It, therefore, seems prudent to consider imaging in the majority of patients with a suspected initial episode of renal colic (Figure 19-1). PAIN CONSIDERATIONS It is believed that the pain of renal colic is largely mediated by the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 in the renal medulla, leading to increased flow through the afferent arterioles and increased renal pelvis pressure. Ureteral smooth muscle spasm may also be a factor.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM Kidney stones occur in an estimated 5% of the population at any given time. The estimated lifetime risk for the passage of a renal stone is approximately 10%. After having one episode of renal colic, an estimated 50% of individuals will suffer a recurrence. It is not surprising, therefore, that there are more than 1 million visits to U.S. emergency departments (EDs) each year because of renal colic. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT Several studies have assessed the accuracy of the diagnosis of renal colic based on clinical presentation. Although the constellation of flank pain, nausea and vomiting, and hematuria has appeared to be reasonably specific in the classical approach to these patients, more recent investigations have suggested that when computed tomography (CT) scanning of the abdomen and pelvis is performed in the acute setting, important alternate diagnoses are identified relatively frequently. In one study of subjects who were thought by the treating physician to have a 90–100% likelihood of suffering a first episode of renal colic, 17% were found to have alternate significant pathology. It, therefore, seems prudent to consider imaging in the majority of patients with a suspected initial episode of renal colic (Figure 19-1). PAIN CONSIDERATIONS It is believed that the pain of renal colic is largely mediated by the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 in the renal medulla, leading to increased flow through the afferent arterioles and increased renal pelvis pressure. Ureteral smooth muscle spasm may also be a factor.

Key concepts: Renal colic, Medicine, Kidney stones, Population, General surgery, Intensive care medicine, Surgery, Alternative medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analgesia for the Renal Colic Patient — Research Paper | ScholarLens