1994•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The Requirement of Consistency and the Problem of Interpretation: Clear Cases and Hard Cases

Neil MacCormick

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter shows the requirement of consistency and the conflict of interpretation. It is easy to put across in a few short words the point about arguments from consistency in law. It also explores the clear cases and hard cases, problems of interpretation and classification, and problems of interpretation in case law. Then it considers the application of case-law rules in a relatively uncontroversial way, the topic of distinguishing precedents, especially where this involves ‘explaining’ them in a restrictive way; and the topic of extending and developing case-law rules.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter shows the requirement of consistency and the conflict of interpretation. It is easy to put across in a few short words the point about arguments from consistency in law. It also explores the clear cases and hard cases, problems of interpretation and classification, and problems of interpretation in case law. Then it considers the application of case-law rules in a relatively uncontroversial way, the topic of distinguishing precedents, especially where this involves ‘explaining’ them in a restrictive way; and the topic of extending and developing case-law rules.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter shows the requirement of consistency and the conflict of interpretation. It is easy to put across in a few short words the point about arguments from consistency in law. It also explores the clear cases and hard cases, problems of interpretation and classification, and problems of interpretation in case law. Then it considers the application of case-law rules in a relatively uncontroversial way, the topic of distinguishing precedents, especially where this involves ‘explaining’ them in a restrictive way; and the topic of extending and developing case-law rules.

Key concepts: Interpretation (philosophy), Consistency (knowledge bases), Point (geometry), Epistemology, Computer science, Law, Mathematics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Requirement of Consistency and the Problem of Interpretation: Clear Cases and Hard Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens