The Requirement of Consistency and the Problem of Interpretation: Clear Cases and Hard Cases
Neil MacCormick
Abstract
Neil MacCormick
Abstract
This chapter shows the requirement of consistency and the conflict of interpretation. It is easy to put across in a few short words the point about arguments from consistency in law. It also explores the clear cases and hard cases, problems of interpretation and classification, and problems of interpretation in case law. Then it considers the application of case-law rules in a relatively uncontroversial way, the topic of distinguishing precedents, especially where this involves ‘explaining’ them in a restrictive way; and the topic of extending and developing case-law rules.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter shows the requirement of consistency and the conflict of interpretation. It is easy to put across in a few short words the point about arguments from consistency in law. It also explores the clear cases and hard cases, problems of interpretation and classification, and problems of interpretation in case law. Then it considers the application of case-law rules in a relatively uncontroversial way, the topic of distinguishing precedents, especially where this involves ‘explaining’ them in a restrictive way; and the topic of extending and developing case-law rules.
Key concepts: Interpretation (philosophy), Consistency (knowledge bases), Point (geometry), Epistemology, Computer science, Law, Mathematics, Political science