1999•Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

Economic and Social Security

June Hopkins

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Early in 1934 Harry Hopkins began formulating a new program for the nation’s unemployed. He emphasized the importance of work, not only as a relief measure but as an integral part of the national recovery effort. Direct relief was no curative for the individual or for the nation, he declared, and the government had to “stop pouring relief into an unfillable void.” The unemployed needed the opportunity to work for wages and industry needed consumer dollars. He admitted that government jobs programs were expensive, but direct relief was “repugnant” and took an enormous toll on the nation’s psyche. The cost of assuring workers a job became irrelevant when measured against the survival of American ideals. 1 Hopkins was convinced that a permanent, national program of employment assurance, working in concert with unemployment insurance, would lead to economic recovery for the nation, ensure real security for American families, and preserve the nation’s democratic values. All he needed was the right occasion to talk it over with the president and he was sure he could convince him of the efficacy of his plan. Many months passed before he found this opportunity. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Early in 1934 Harry Hopkins began formulating a new program for the nation’s unemployed. He emphasized the importance of work, not only as a relief measure but as an integral part of the national recovery effort. Direct relief was no curative for the individual or for the nation, he declared, and the government had to “stop pouring relief into an unfillable void.” The unemployed needed the opportunity to work for wages and industry needed consumer dollars. He admitted that government jobs programs were expensive, but direct relief was “repugnant” and took an enormous toll on the nation’s psyche. The cost of assuring workers a job became irrelevant when measured against the survival of American ideals. 1 Hopkins was convinced that a permanent, national program of employment assurance, working in concert with unemployment insurance, would lead to economic recovery for the nation, ensure real security for American families, and preserve the nation’s democratic values. All he needed was the right occasion to talk it over with the president and he was sure he could convince him of the efficacy of his plan. Many months passed before he found this opportunity. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Early in 1934 Harry Hopkins began formulating a new program for the nation’s unemployed. He emphasized the importance of work, not only as a relief measure but as an integral part of the national recovery effort. Direct relief was no curative for the individual or for the nation, he declared, and the government had to “stop pouring relief into an unfillable void.” The unemployed needed the opportunity to work for wages and industry needed consumer dollars. He admitted that government jobs programs were expensive, but direct relief was “repugnant” and took an enormous toll on the nation’s psyche. The cost of assuring workers a job became irrelevant when measured against the survival of American ideals. 1 Hopkins was convinced that a permanent, national program of employment assurance, working in concert with unemployment insurance, would lead to economic recovery for the nation, ensure real security for American families, and preserve the nation’s democratic values. All he needed was the right occasion to talk it over with the president and he was sure he could convince him of the efficacy of his plan. Many months passed before he found this opportunity. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Unemployment, Government (linguistics), Work (physics), Toll, National security, Democracy, Social security, Economic recovery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Economic and Social Security — Research Paper | ScholarLens