2016•Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

The Politics of the Khilafa, Old and New

Kamal Soleimani

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter briefly addresses the historical intra-Muslim debates over the concept of caliphate (“Islamic” governance), demonstrating how crucial Islamic concepts such as the caliphate cannot be understood meaningfully without situating them in relation to specific times and places. The author argues that the establishment of the caliphate was not informed by any “universalist dogma,” but by pressing communal issues such as tribal and communal rivalries. The caliphate—both as a concept and as an institution—underwent various historical metamorphoses. By showing how caliphate politics was closely linked to the rise of nationalism and anti-colonialism in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the author challenges the common assumption—in the scholarship on Ottoman history—that Islam was a hindrance to ethnic self-consciousness. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter briefly addresses the historical intra-Muslim debates over the concept of caliphate (“Islamic” governance), demonstrating how crucial Islamic concepts such as the caliphate cannot be understood meaningfully without situating them in relation to specific times and places. The author argues that the establishment of the caliphate was not informed by any “universalist dogma,” but by pressing communal issues such as tribal and communal rivalries. The caliphate—both as a concept and as an institution—underwent various historical metamorphoses. By showing how caliphate politics was closely linked to the rise of nationalism and anti-colonialism in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the author challenges the common assumption—in the scholarship on Ottoman history—that Islam was a hindrance to ethnic self-consciousness. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter briefly addresses the historical intra-Muslim debates over the concept of caliphate (“Islamic” governance), demonstrating how crucial Islamic concepts such as the caliphate cannot be understood meaningfully without situating them in relation to specific times and places. The author argues that the establishment of the caliphate was not informed by any “universalist dogma,” but by pressing communal issues such as tribal and communal rivalries. The caliphate—both as a concept and as an institution—underwent various historical metamorphoses. By showing how caliphate politics was closely linked to the rise of nationalism and anti-colonialism in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the author challenges the common assumption—in the scholarship on Ottoman history—that Islam was a hindrance to ethnic self-consciousness. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Caliphate, Scholarship, Politics, Islam, Political science, Nationalism, Historicity (philosophy), History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Politics of the Khilafa, Old and New — Research Paper | ScholarLens