2003Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

Institutional Dynamics: The Power of Structure

Lance D. Fusarelli

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

If political culture creates the sociocultural context of policymaking, then institutions provide the essential structure, the rules of the game, within which policymaking occurs. Institutional theory, developed in the fields of political science, history, sociology, and organizational studies, focuses not on actors as change agents but rather on the effects of institutions in shaping or mediating policy change. Consisting of numerous (and sometimes significantly) different approaches, this approach is generally known as the new institutionalism. 1 Although it encompasses a variety of perspectives, from rational choice to historical institutionalism, the core idea of the approach is the recognition that institutions of the state shape policy change. 2 Institutions play an integral role in defining individual, group, and societal identities and are, it is argued, much more than simple mirrors of social forces. 3 This perspective contrasts sharply with the behavioral point of view, whereby institutions are “portrayed simply as arenas within which political behavior, driven by more fundamental factors, occurs.” 4 Institutional theory suggests that various institutional constraints play a key role in shaping policy choices and outcomes. 5 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

If political culture creates the sociocultural context of policymaking, then institutions provide the essential structure, the rules of the game, within which policymaking occurs. Institutional theory, developed in the fields of political science, history, sociology, and organizational studies, focuses not on actors as change agents but rather on the effects of institutions in shaping or mediating policy change. Consisting of numerous (and sometimes significantly) different approaches, this approach is generally known as the new institutionalism. 1 Although it encompasses a variety of perspectives, from rational choice to historical institutionalism, the core idea of the approach is the recognition that institutions of the state shape policy change. 2 Institutions play an integral role in defining individual, group, and societal identities and are, it is argued, much more than simple mirrors of social forces. 3 This perspective contrasts sharply with the behavioral point of view, whereby institutions are “portrayed simply as arenas within which political behavior, driven by more fundamental factors, occurs.” 4 Institutional theory suggests that various institutional constraints play a key role in shaping policy choices and outcomes. 5 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

If political culture creates the sociocultural context of policymaking, then institutions provide the essential structure, the rules of the game, within which policymaking occurs. Institutional theory, developed in the fields of political science, history, sociology, and organizational studies, focuses not on actors as change agents but rather on the effects of institutions in shaping or mediating policy change. Consisting of numerous (and sometimes significantly) different approaches, this approach is generally known as the new institutionalism. 1 Although it encompasses a variety of perspectives, from rational choice to historical institutionalism, the core idea of the approach is the recognition that institutions of the state shape policy change. 2 Institutions play an integral role in defining individual, group, and societal identities and are, it is argued, much more than simple mirrors of social forces. 3 This perspective contrasts sharply with the behavioral point of view, whereby institutions are “portrayed simply as arenas within which political behavior, driven by more fundamental factors, occurs.” 4 Institutional theory suggests that various institutional constraints play a key role in shaping policy choices and outcomes. 5 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: New institutionalism, Institutionalism, Politics, Sociocultural evolution, Historical institutionalism, Positive economics, Political science, Variety (cybernetics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Institutional Dynamics: The Power of Structure — Research Paper | ScholarLens