2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Design of an instrumented model pile for axial cyclic loading

Julio Rakotonindriana

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

When choosing the pile diameter the “scale effect” must be considered, as it is linked to the ratio of the pile diameter (B) relative to the mean size (d50) of the soil particle. The “scale effect” appears as a growth of the resistance of the pile to tension loading, hence the skin friction, when the pile diameter is small (Garnier & König 1998). When the ratio (B/d50) increases, we are close to the prototype case and it reduces particle size effect and hence the “scale effect”. The main difficulty is to know at which ratio no “scale effect” is observed. The “scale effect” has been discussed by many people but no consensus has been found (Garnier 1995; Foray et al. 1998). Balachowski (1995) suggests that when the ratio B/d50 is higher than 250, no “scale effect” is observed; Garnier & König (1998) advise a ratio of 100 and Fioravante (2002) a ratio of 50.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When choosing the pile diameter the “scale effect” must be considered, as it is linked to the ratio of the pile diameter (B) relative to the mean size (d50) of the soil particle. The “scale effect” appears as a growth of the resistance of the pile to tension loading, hence the skin friction, when the pile diameter is small (Garnier & König 1998). When the ratio (B/d50) increases, we are close to the prototype case and it reduces particle size effect and hence the “scale effect”. The main difficulty is to know at which ratio no “scale effect” is observed. The “scale effect” has been discussed by many people but no consensus has been found (Garnier 1995; Foray et al. 1998). Balachowski (1995) suggests that when the ratio B/d50 is higher than 250, no “scale effect” is observed; Garnier & König (1998) advise a ratio of 100 and Fioravante (2002) a ratio of 50.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When choosing the pile diameter the “scale effect” must be considered, as it is linked to the ratio of the pile diameter (B) relative to the mean size (d50) of the soil particle. The “scale effect” appears as a growth of the resistance of the pile to tension loading, hence the skin friction, when the pile diameter is small (Garnier & König 1998). When the ratio (B/d50) increases, we are close to the prototype case and it reduces particle size effect and hence the “scale effect”. The main difficulty is to know at which ratio no “scale effect” is observed. The “scale effect” has been discussed by many people but no consensus has been found (Garnier 1995; Foray et al. 1998). Balachowski (1995) suggests that when the ratio B/d50 is higher than 250, no “scale effect” is observed; Garnier & König (1998) advise a ratio of 100 and Fioravante (2002) a ratio of 50.

Key concepts: Pile, Centrifuge, Instrumentation (computer programming), Foundation (evidence), Structural engineering, Geotechnical engineering, Engineering, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Design of an instrumented model pile for axial cyclic loading — Research Paper | ScholarLens