2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Postscript: how Game Strategy differs from Game Theory

A. Buchholz, Wolfram WÖrdemann, Ned Wiley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There are important similarities between game theory and game strategy. They both attempt to explain the behavior of the players and seek to determine optimal strategies in the competition. However, that is where the similarity ends. One will observe that game theory arrives at optimal economic behavior strategies by looking at things from the perspective of either ‘both-try-to-outwit-the-other’ or ‘the-best-for-both’ solutions. Changing the game or any of the rules has nothing to do with game theory but that is the central, core theme of game strategy. This chapter indicates that game theory is far too theoretical and abstract to be of practical use to managers who are trying to develop a success strategy for the marketplace; however, for game strategies, it is the just the reverse.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are important similarities between game theory and game strategy. They both attempt to explain the behavior of the players and seek to determine optimal strategies in the competition. However, that is where the similarity ends. One will observe that game theory arrives at optimal economic behavior strategies by looking at things from the perspective of either ‘both-try-to-outwit-the-other’ or ‘the-best-for-both’ solutions. Changing the game or any of the rules has nothing to do with game theory but that is the central, core theme of game strategy. This chapter indicates that game theory is far too theoretical and abstract to be of practical use to managers who are trying to develop a success strategy for the marketplace; however, for game strategies, it is the just the reverse.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are important similarities between game theory and game strategy. They both attempt to explain the behavior of the players and seek to determine optimal strategies in the competition. However, that is where the similarity ends. One will observe that game theory arrives at optimal economic behavior strategies by looking at things from the perspective of either ‘both-try-to-outwit-the-other’ or ‘the-best-for-both’ solutions. Changing the game or any of the rules has nothing to do with game theory but that is the central, core theme of game strategy. This chapter indicates that game theory is far too theoretical and abstract to be of practical use to managers who are trying to develop a success strategy for the marketplace; however, for game strategies, it is the just the reverse.

Key concepts: Game theory, Non-cooperative game, Core (optical fiber), Repeated game, Positive political theory, Algorithmic game theory, Sequential game, Simulations and games in economics education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Postscript: how Game Strategy differs from Game Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens