Judicial Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada
Kent Roach
Abstract
Kent Roach
Abstract
This chapter begins with an examination of the political dimensions of Canada's debate about judicial activism, focusing on the criticisms of judicial activism that have come from both the conservative right and the progressive left. Judicial activism is discussed against the backdrop of various subject matters including criminal justice, national security, gay rights, Aboriginal and treaty rights, and various aspects of political, social, and economic policy. Such an approach facilitates a contextual discussion of judicial activism that includes the role of the courts not only in constitutional adjudication, but also with respect to statutory interpretation and the development of the common law.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter begins with an examination of the political dimensions of Canada's debate about judicial activism, focusing on the criticisms of judicial activism that have come from both the conservative right and the progressive left. Judicial activism is discussed against the backdrop of various subject matters including criminal justice, national security, gay rights, Aboriginal and treaty rights, and various aspects of political, social, and economic policy. Such an approach facilitates a contextual discussion of judicial activism that includes the role of the courts not only in constitutional adjudication, but also with respect to statutory interpretation and the development of the common law.
Key concepts: Judicial activism, Political science, Law, Judicial review, Supreme court, Adjudication, Judicial interpretation, Politics