2013Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Diagnosis of myeloma and related plasma cell disorders

Roger G. Owen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Morphology Central to the diagnosis of myeloma is the demonstration of bone marrow infiltration by monoclonal plasma cells. The extent of infiltration typically exceeds 10% although it is well recognized that marrow disease can be patchy and a minority of patients with symptomatic myeloma will have <10% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC)[1]. The 10% threshold chosen to distinguish myeloma from MGUS is somewhat arbitrary as both disorders form a continuous spectrum and it is therefore essential that the extent of marrow infiltration is correlated with the clinical features before a definitive diagnosis is made. It is recommended that a trephine biopsy be obtained in most patients as it provides a better assessment of the extent of marrow infiltration than even the best quality aspirate smears[2]. It is well recognized that bone marrow aspirate plasma cell counts consistently underestimate the overall level of infiltration[3–6]. An adequate trephine also ensures that a diagnosis can be made when the bone marrow aspirate specimen is of poor quality. Plasma cell cytomorphology varies considerably from patient to patient and a number of groups have proposed classification schema and have also demonstrated that cases with so-called blastic cytology have an inferior outcome[7–9]. However, such morphological classification schemes are poorly reproducible and have been largely superseded as prognostic tools by cytogenetic abnormalities and clinical parameters such as the International Staging System (ISS).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Morphology Central to the diagnosis of myeloma is the demonstration of bone marrow infiltration by monoclonal plasma cells. The extent of infiltration typically exceeds 10% although it is well recognized that marrow disease can be patchy and a minority of patients with symptomatic myeloma will have <10% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC)[1]. The 10% threshold chosen to distinguish myeloma from MGUS is somewhat arbitrary as both disorders form a continuous spectrum and it is therefore essential that the extent of marrow infiltration is correlated with the clinical features before a definitive diagnosis is made. It is recommended that a trephine biopsy be obtained in most patients as it provides a better assessment of the extent of marrow infiltration than even the best quality aspirate smears[2]. It is well recognized that bone marrow aspirate plasma cell counts consistently underestimate the overall level of infiltration[3–6]. An adequate trephine also ensures that a diagnosis can be made when the bone marrow aspirate specimen is of poor quality. Plasma cell cytomorphology varies considerably from patient to patient and a number of groups have proposed classification schema and have also demonstrated that cases with so-called blastic cytology have an inferior outcome[7–9]. However, such morphological classification schemes are poorly reproducible and have been largely superseded as prognostic tools by cytogenetic abnormalities and clinical parameters such as the International Staging System (ISS).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Morphology Central to the diagnosis of myeloma is the demonstration of bone marrow infiltration by monoclonal plasma cells. The extent of infiltration typically exceeds 10% although it is well recognized that marrow disease can be patchy and a minority of patients with symptomatic myeloma will have <10% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC)[1]. The 10% threshold chosen to distinguish myeloma from MGUS is somewhat arbitrary as both disorders form a continuous spectrum and it is therefore essential that the extent of marrow infiltration is correlated with the clinical features before a definitive diagnosis is made. It is recommended that a trephine biopsy be obtained in most patients as it provides a better assessment of the extent of marrow infiltration than even the best quality aspirate smears[2]. It is well recognized that bone marrow aspirate plasma cell counts consistently underestimate the overall level of infiltration[3–6]. An adequate trephine also ensures that a diagnosis can be made when the bone marrow aspirate specimen is of poor quality. Plasma cell cytomorphology varies considerably from patient to patient and a number of groups have proposed classification schema and have also demonstrated that cases with so-called blastic cytology have an inferior outcome[7–9]. However, such morphological classification schemes are poorly reproducible and have been largely superseded as prognostic tools by cytogenetic abnormalities and clinical parameters such as the International Staging System (ISS).

Key concepts: Bone marrow, Multiple myeloma, Medicine, Plasma Cell Myeloma, Infiltration (HVAC), Pathology, Trephine, Biopsy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnosis of myeloma and related plasma cell disorders — Research Paper | ScholarLens