2015Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Vulnerability and Defencelessness

Seth Lazar

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In ordinary thinking about the morality of war, the vulnerability and defencelessness of civilians is at the heart of their privileged moral status. But we lack both analyses of what these concepts are, and explanations of why they matter. This chapter analyses defencelessness in terms of vulnerability, then presents a series of arguments to show that harming those who are more defenceless and vulnerable is worse than harming those who are less so, drawing on prioritarian moral considerations, reasons of fairness, and the special wrong of disempowering one’s victims, as well as killing them. Although there are exceptions, civilians are typically more vulnerable and defenceless than soldiers, so killing innocent civilians is worse than killing innocent soldiers (vulnerability and defencelessness are irrelevant when the target is not innocent).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In ordinary thinking about the morality of war, the vulnerability and defencelessness of civilians is at the heart of their privileged moral status. But we lack both analyses of what these concepts are, and explanations of why they matter. This chapter analyses defencelessness in terms of vulnerability, then presents a series of arguments to show that harming those who are more defenceless and vulnerable is worse than harming those who are less so, drawing on prioritarian moral considerations, reasons of fairness, and the special wrong of disempowering one’s victims, as well as killing them. Although there are exceptions, civilians are typically more vulnerable and defenceless than soldiers, so killing innocent civilians is worse than killing innocent soldiers (vulnerability and defencelessness are irrelevant when the target is not innocent).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In ordinary thinking about the morality of war, the vulnerability and defencelessness of civilians is at the heart of their privileged moral status. But we lack both analyses of what these concepts are, and explanations of why they matter. This chapter analyses defencelessness in terms of vulnerability, then presents a series of arguments to show that harming those who are more defenceless and vulnerable is worse than harming those who are less so, drawing on prioritarian moral considerations, reasons of fairness, and the special wrong of disempowering one’s victims, as well as killing them. Although there are exceptions, civilians are typically more vulnerable and defenceless than soldiers, so killing innocent civilians is worse than killing innocent soldiers (vulnerability and defencelessness are irrelevant when the target is not innocent).

Key concepts: Vulnerability (computing), Computer science, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vulnerability and Defencelessness — Research Paper | ScholarLens