ABSURDITY AS UNARY OPERATOR
Sergei Pavlovich Odintsov
Abstract
Sergei Pavlovich Odintsov
Abstract
It was shown in the previous work of the author that one can avoid the paradox of minimal logic {ϕ, ¬ϕ} ├ ¬ψ defining the negation operator via reduction not a constant of absurdity, but to a unary operator of absurdity. In the present article we study in details what does it mean that negation in a logical system can be represented via an absurdity or contradiction operator. We distinguish different sorts of such presentations. Finally, we consider the possibility to represent the negation via absurdity and contradiction operators in such well known systems of paraconsistent logic as D.Batens’s logic CLuN and Sette’s logic P1.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It was shown in the previous work of the author that one can avoid the paradox of minimal logic {ϕ, ¬ϕ} ├ ¬ψ defining the negation operator via reduction not a constant of absurdity, but to a unary operator of absurdity. In the present article we study in details what does it mean that negation in a logical system can be represented via an absurdity or contradiction operator. We distinguish different sorts of such presentations. Finally, we consider the possibility to represent the negation via absurdity and contradiction operators in such well known systems of paraconsistent logic as D.Batens’s logic CLuN and Sette’s logic P1.
Key concepts: Absurdity, Negation, Unary operation, Contradiction, Operator (biology), Mathematics, Intuitionistic logic, Calculus (dental)