2014•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Lives, Networks and Topographies of Time and Place: New Turns in the History of Women and Education

Deirdre Raftery

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The late 1970s saw the start of significant growth in women’s history, particularly in Western Europe and North America where some universities acknowledged the burgeoning interest by opening women’s studies departments and research centers and academic publishers added publications in women’s history to their catalogues. The literature that emerged was often exciting, as scholars wrestled with the purpose of such history; should they write women into mainstream history, or should they develop new ways of writing history? On the one hand, concern with women’s issues’ marginalized women’s history, but on the other hand fitting women’s history into the ‘empty spaces’ in mainstream history was unsatisfactory to scholars who criticized the patriarchal nature of the predominant historical discourse’. 1 Historians did important work in uncovering lost’ women, and identifying examples of women’s agency. 2 Within the history of education, scholarship followed a similar pattern. Those interested in the history of female education mined the archives of universities, schools, philanthropic associations and education societies, to identify women and champion their initiative and industry. 3 But dissatisfaction with such discourse led scholars to become weary of stories designed to celebrate women’s agency [which] began to seem predictable and repetitious … information gathering to prove a point that has already been made’. 4 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The late 1970s saw the start of significant growth in women’s history, particularly in Western Europe and North America where some universities acknowledged the burgeoning interest by opening women’s studies departments and research centers and academic publishers added publications in women’s history to their catalogues. The literature that emerged was often exciting, as scholars wrestled with the purpose of such history; should they write women into mainstream history, or should they develop new ways of writing history? On the one hand, concern with women’s issues’ marginalized women’s history, but on the other hand fitting women’s history into the ‘empty spaces’ in mainstream history was unsatisfactory to scholars who criticized the patriarchal nature of the predominant historical discourse’. 1 Historians did important work in uncovering lost’ women, and identifying examples of women’s agency. 2 Within the history of education, scholarship followed a similar pattern. Those interested in the history of female education mined the archives of universities, schools, philanthropic associations and education societies, to identify women and champion their initiative and industry. 3 But dissatisfaction with such discourse led scholars to become weary of stories designed to celebrate women’s agency [which] began to seem predictable and repetitious … information gathering to prove a point that has already been made’. 4 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The late 1970s saw the start of significant growth in women’s history, particularly in Western Europe and North America where some universities acknowledged the burgeoning interest by opening women’s studies departments and research centers and academic publishers added publications in women’s history to their catalogues. The literature that emerged was often exciting, as scholars wrestled with the purpose of such history; should they write women into mainstream history, or should they develop new ways of writing history? On the one hand, concern with women’s issues’ marginalized women’s history, but on the other hand fitting women’s history into the ‘empty spaces’ in mainstream history was unsatisfactory to scholars who criticized the patriarchal nature of the predominant historical discourse’. 1 Historians did important work in uncovering lost’ women, and identifying examples of women’s agency. 2 Within the history of education, scholarship followed a similar pattern. Those interested in the history of female education mined the archives of universities, schools, philanthropic associations and education societies, to identify women and champion their initiative and industry. 3 But dissatisfaction with such discourse led scholars to become weary of stories designed to celebrate women’s agency [which] began to seem predictable and repetitious … information gathering to prove a point that has already been made’. 4 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Mainstream, Champion, Scholarship, Agency (philosophy), Women's history, Gender studies, Historiography, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lives, Networks and Topographies of Time and Place: New Turns in the History of Women and Education — Research Paper | ScholarLens