2016Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Social Welfare Policies

Despina Alexiadou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter tests the policy role of ministerial types employing three different indicators of social welfare generosity: welfare state de-commodification, unemployment generosity insurance, and sickness generosity insurance. Both hypotheses find strong empirical support in a sample of eighteen parliamentary democracies. Left ideologues and left partisans, alike, have played a central role in advancing social welfare expansion. Equivalently, right ideologues have been behind social welfare retrenchment. These effects are the strongest in multiparty and in minority cabinets. In the presence of strict fiscal rules and/or powerful finance ministers, only left partisans have a positive and independent effect on social welfare reform. Importantly, ministerial types explain policy change better than the ideological gravity of cabinets or the partisanship of the premier.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter tests the policy role of ministerial types employing three different indicators of social welfare generosity: welfare state de-commodification, unemployment generosity insurance, and sickness generosity insurance. Both hypotheses find strong empirical support in a sample of eighteen parliamentary democracies. Left ideologues and left partisans, alike, have played a central role in advancing social welfare expansion. Equivalently, right ideologues have been behind social welfare retrenchment. These effects are the strongest in multiparty and in minority cabinets. In the presence of strict fiscal rules and/or powerful finance ministers, only left partisans have a positive and independent effect on social welfare reform. Importantly, ministerial types explain policy change better than the ideological gravity of cabinets or the partisanship of the premier.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter tests the policy role of ministerial types employing three different indicators of social welfare generosity: welfare state de-commodification, unemployment generosity insurance, and sickness generosity insurance. Both hypotheses find strong empirical support in a sample of eighteen parliamentary democracies. Left ideologues and left partisans, alike, have played a central role in advancing social welfare expansion. Equivalently, right ideologues have been behind social welfare retrenchment. These effects are the strongest in multiparty and in minority cabinets. In the presence of strict fiscal rules and/or powerful finance ministers, only left partisans have a positive and independent effect on social welfare reform. Importantly, ministerial types explain policy change better than the ideological gravity of cabinets or the partisanship of the premier.

Key concepts: Social Welfare, Welfare, Public economics, Business, Political science, Economics, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Social Welfare Policies — Research Paper | ScholarLens