2016Journal of Cancer Research and TherapeuticsOpen access

Need of collaborative radiology–radiation oncology workshops in decision making for head and neck cancer (HNC) management in India: Perspectives of the radiation oncologists

Tejinder Kataria, Trinanjan Basu, Shikha Goyal, Deepak Gupta

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In India, head and neck cancer (HNC) has always been a challenge to treatment due to its various disease., treatment., and patient.related factors. Recent developments in the field of both radiology and radiation oncology brings us to a stage where combined collaborative efforts are required for proper management of HNC. The article identifies the potential areas of such need through online survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This anonymous online survey with specific questions and their responses from radiation oncology community identifies potential areas of radiology expertise as perceived by a radiation oncologist. The questions were simple Likert-type and the best possible response was sought for. RESULTS: There were 57 email responses and majority (37) agreed upon the extreme importance of such collaborative efforts. The major areas where a radiation oncologist would seek help are target volume delineation and response evaluation posttreatment in HNC, though other areas are also important albeit to a lesser degree. CONCLUSION: There is urgent need of radiology.radiation oncology workshops in managing HNC in the modern era of image.based and image-guided treatment. Future larger hospital.based survey would determine need on a large scale basis at resolving these issues.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: In India, head and neck cancer (HNC) has always been a challenge to treatment due to its various disease., treatment., and patient.related factors. Recent developments in the field of both radiology and radiation oncology brings us to a stage where combined collaborative efforts are required for proper management of HNC. The article identifies the potential areas of such need through online survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This anonymous online survey with specific questions and their responses from radiation oncology community identifies potential areas of radiology expertise as perceived by a radiation oncologist. The questions were simple Likert-type and the best possible response was sought for. RESULTS: There were 57 email responses and majority (37) agreed upon the extreme importance of such collaborative efforts. The major areas where a radiation oncologist would seek help are target volume delineation and response evaluation posttreatment in HNC, though other areas are also important albeit to a lesser degree. CONCLUSION: There is urgent need of radiology.radiation oncology workshops in managing HNC in the modern era of image.based and image-guided treatment. Future larger hospital.based survey would determine need on a large scale basis at resolving these issues.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: In India, head and neck cancer (HNC) has always been a challenge to treatment due to its various disease., treatment., and patient.related factors. Recent developments in the field of both radiology and radiation oncology brings us to a stage where combined collaborative efforts are required for proper management of HNC. The article identifies the potential areas of such need through online survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This anonymous online survey with specific questions and their responses from radiation oncology community identifies potential areas of radiology expertise as perceived by a radiation oncologist. The questions were simple Likert-type and the best possible response was sought for. RESULTS: There were 57 email responses and majority (37) agreed upon the extreme importance of such collaborative efforts. The major areas where a radiation oncologist would seek help are target volume delineation and response evaluation posttreatment in HNC, though other areas are also important albeit to a lesser degree. CONCLUSION: There is urgent need of radiology.radiation oncology workshops in managing HNC in the modern era of image.based and image-guided treatment. Future larger hospital.based survey would determine need on a large scale basis at resolving these issues.

Key concepts: Radiation oncologist, Radiation oncology, Medicine, Radiation Therapist, Medical physics, Head and neck cancer, Head and neck, Likert scale

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Need of collaborative radiology–radiation oncology workshops in decision making for head and neck cancer (HNC) management in India: Perspectives of the radiation oncologists — Research Paper | ScholarLens