2007Unpublished venueOpen access

Reversible Agreements Without Externalities

Debraj Ray

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This chapter analyzes reversible commitments in two steps. First, it studies reversible commitments in situations without externalities across coalitions. It shows that any equilibrium of this game satisfying some mild restrictions must lead, ultimately, to absorption into an unchanging, efficient payoff outcomes. Such a finding is in sharp contrast to games with irreversible commitments, in which inefficiency can be endemic even in situations without externalities. The assumption that negotiations are, in principle, ever-ongoing is central for this result.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This chapter analyzes reversible commitments in two steps. First, it studies reversible commitments in situations without externalities across coalitions. It shows that any equilibrium of this game satisfying some mild restrictions must lead, ultimately, to absorption into an unchanging, efficient payoff outcomes. Such a finding is in sharp contrast to games with irreversible commitments, in which inefficiency can be endemic even in situations without externalities. The assumption that negotiations are, in principle, ever-ongoing is central for this result.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This chapter analyzes reversible commitments in two steps. First, it studies reversible commitments in situations without externalities across coalitions. It shows that any equilibrium of this game satisfying some mild restrictions must lead, ultimately, to absorption into an unchanging, efficient payoff outcomes. Such a finding is in sharp contrast to games with irreversible commitments, in which inefficiency can be endemic even in situations without externalities. The assumption that negotiations are, in principle, ever-ongoing is central for this result.

Key concepts: Inefficiency, Externality, Negotiation, Microeconomics, Economics, Stochastic game, Law and economics, Mathematical economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reversible Agreements Without Externalities — Research Paper | ScholarLens