2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Information management systems

Enrico Coiera

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Information is care. Every clinical decision is predicated on information about the patient and about the patient’s treatment choices. We saw in Part 1 that whenever a decision is important enough, or is made often enough, an information system can be built to support it. In this chapter we examine both how and when healthcare processes and decisions need to be structured from an informational viewpoint. Two key concepts are examined. Firstly, the central notion of an information management cycle is introduced. Second, we explore why it is not always necessary or indeed appropriate to formalize this cycle completely. To do so can be counterproductive, by introducing excessive bureaucracy, especially when flexibility in decision-making is needed. Consequently, we see that many information processes are left in an unstructured or informal state and are more likely to be supported by communication processes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Information is care. Every clinical decision is predicated on information about the patient and about the patient’s treatment choices. We saw in Part 1 that whenever a decision is important enough, or is made often enough, an information system can be built to support it. In this chapter we examine both how and when healthcare processes and decisions need to be structured from an informational viewpoint. Two key concepts are examined. Firstly, the central notion of an information management cycle is introduced. Second, we explore why it is not always necessary or indeed appropriate to formalize this cycle completely. To do so can be counterproductive, by introducing excessive bureaucracy, especially when flexibility in decision-making is needed. Consequently, we see that many information processes are left in an unstructured or informal state and are more likely to be supported by communication processes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Information is care. Every clinical decision is predicated on information about the patient and about the patient’s treatment choices. We saw in Part 1 that whenever a decision is important enough, or is made often enough, an information system can be built to support it. In this chapter we examine both how and when healthcare processes and decisions need to be structured from an informational viewpoint. Two key concepts are examined. Firstly, the central notion of an information management cycle is introduced. Second, we explore why it is not always necessary or indeed appropriate to formalize this cycle completely. To do so can be counterproductive, by introducing excessive bureaucracy, especially when flexibility in decision-making is needed. Consequently, we see that many information processes are left in an unstructured or informal state and are more likely to be supported by communication processes.

Key concepts: Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Information management systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens