The social imaginary of study abroad: complexities and contradictions
Ryūko Kubota
Abstract
Ryūko Kubota
Abstract
Many universities around the world today are actively promoting study abroad to raise their international profiles. This trend is tied to the neoliberal social imaginary, which constructs study abroad as a tool for students to develop communication skills, a global mindset, intercultural competence and a competitive edge in global labour marketplaces. Such social imaginary is reflected in online descriptions of the imagined benefits that study abroad generates: for example, developing language skills, fostering cultural understanding and intercultural competence, facilitating personal growth and identity formation, and increasing career opportunities. Juxtaposing these alleged benefits with the themes that have emerged from the empirical studies reported in this special issue, this article critically examines the social imaginary of study abroad. Various factors that affect the outcomes of study abroad indicate that students’ sojourn experiences and purported benefits do not have a simple causal relationship; rather, the relationship is fraught with complexities and contradictions. Despite potential rewards, study abroad cannot escape gender, racial, geographical and socioeconomic inequalities.
OpenAlex reports 98 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Many universities around the world today are actively promoting study abroad to raise their international profiles. This trend is tied to the neoliberal social imaginary, which constructs study abroad as a tool for students to develop communication skills, a global mindset, intercultural competence and a competitive edge in global labour marketplaces. Such social imaginary is reflected in online descriptions of the imagined benefits that study abroad generates: for example, developing language skills, fostering cultural understanding and intercultural competence, facilitating personal growth and identity formation, and increasing career opportunities. Juxtaposing these alleged benefits with the themes that have emerged from the empirical studies reported in this special issue, this article critically examines the social imaginary of study abroad. Various factors that affect the outcomes of study abroad indicate that students’ sojourn experiences and purported benefits do not have a simple causal relationship; rather, the relationship is fraught with complexities and contradictions. Despite potential rewards, study abroad cannot escape gender, racial, geographical and socioeconomic inequalities.
Key concepts: The Imaginary, Study abroad, Mindset, Competence (human resources), Sociology, Intercultural competence, Socioeconomic status, Cultural competence