2013•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

International Human Rights and Intangible Cultural Heritage

Lucas Lixinski

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This chapter is the first in the second part of the book, focusing on remedies for ICH safeguarding. The chapter focuses specifically on the potentials and pitfalls of using international human rights law to safeguard intangible heritage. The chapter argues that, while human rights law is a useful tool, to the extent the protection of intangible heritage is often justified in relation to cultural identity, it disregards the important group dimension of ICH. It looks at case law from regional courts and UN treaty bodies with respect to cultural identity issues to enquire whether international human rights adjudication can be used as a means to redress harm to intangible cultural heritage. Cultural identity issues are dealt with not only as an autonomous right, but also with respect to rights such as freedom of expression, freedom of religion, equality, and the right to private and family life, among others.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter is the first in the second part of the book, focusing on remedies for ICH safeguarding. The chapter focuses specifically on the potentials and pitfalls of using international human rights law to safeguard intangible heritage. The chapter argues that, while human rights law is a useful tool, to the extent the protection of intangible heritage is often justified in relation to cultural identity, it disregards the important group dimension of ICH. It looks at case law from regional courts and UN treaty bodies with respect to cultural identity issues to enquire whether international human rights adjudication can be used as a means to redress harm to intangible cultural heritage. Cultural identity issues are dealt with not only as an autonomous right, but also with respect to rights such as freedom of expression, freedom of religion, equality, and the right to private and family life, among others.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter is the first in the second part of the book, focusing on remedies for ICH safeguarding. The chapter focuses specifically on the potentials and pitfalls of using international human rights law to safeguard intangible heritage. The chapter argues that, while human rights law is a useful tool, to the extent the protection of intangible heritage is often justified in relation to cultural identity, it disregards the important group dimension of ICH. It looks at case law from regional courts and UN treaty bodies with respect to cultural identity issues to enquire whether international human rights adjudication can be used as a means to redress harm to intangible cultural heritage. Cultural identity issues are dealt with not only as an autonomous right, but also with respect to rights such as freedom of expression, freedom of religion, equality, and the right to private and family life, among others.

Key concepts: Human rights, Intangible cultural heritage, International human rights law, Political science, Redress, Cultural heritage, Fundamental rights, Safeguarding

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
International Human Rights and Intangible Cultural Heritage — Research Paper | ScholarLens