2013Unpublished venueRequires access

SOME OUGHTS AND OUGHT-NOTS ON CRIMINALIZATION IN IRANIAN CRIMINAL LAW

Poorbafrani Hassan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Undoubtedly, criminalization is one of most complex and difficult legislative areas, which needs to be based on criminal-law principles.  Criminalization involves substantive criteria such as limited sphere, and proportionality between crime and punishment, as well as formal criteria such as explicitness and transparency, If these criteria are not met, then goals behind criminalization will be not achieved and criminal law will be damaged, and most importantly, a over-criminalization will be formed. Having examined some substantive and formal oughts and ought-nots in the light of existing criminal law, this paper concludes that criminalization in Iranian criminal law, especially in sphere of concretionary crimes, is not substantively and formally compatible with its underlying principles

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Undoubtedly, criminalization is one of most complex and difficult legislative areas, which needs to be based on criminal-law principles.  Criminalization involves substantive criteria such as limited sphere, and proportionality between crime and punishment, as well as formal criteria such as explicitness and transparency, If these criteria are not met, then goals behind criminalization will be not achieved and criminal law will be damaged, and most importantly, a over-criminalization will be formed. Having examined some substantive and formal oughts and ought-nots in the light of existing criminal law, this paper concludes that criminalization in Iranian criminal law, especially in sphere of concretionary crimes, is not substantively and formally compatible with its underlying principles

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Undoubtedly, criminalization is one of most complex and difficult legislative areas, which needs to be based on criminal-law principles.  Criminalization involves substantive criteria such as limited sphere, and proportionality between crime and punishment, as well as formal criteria such as explicitness and transparency, If these criteria are not met, then goals behind criminalization will be not achieved and criminal law will be damaged, and most importantly, a over-criminalization will be formed. Having examined some substantive and formal oughts and ought-nots in the light of existing criminal law, this paper concludes that criminalization in Iranian criminal law, especially in sphere of concretionary crimes, is not substantively and formally compatible with its underlying principles

Key concepts: Criminalization, Criminal law, Law, Criminology, Legislature, Political science, Proportionality (law), Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SOME OUGHTS AND OUGHT-NOTS ON CRIMINALIZATION IN IRANIAN CRIMINAL LAW — Research Paper | ScholarLens