2009Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooksRequires access

1. The Moore—Penrose or Generalized Inverse

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

1. Basic definitions Equations of the form Ax=b,A∈ ℂm×n ,x∈ ℂn ,b∈ ℂm 1 occur in many pure and applied problems. If and is invertible, then the system of equations (1) is, in principle, easy to solve. The unique solution is . If A is an arbitrary matrix in , then it becomes more difficult to solve (1). There may be none, one, or an infinite number of solutions depending on whether b∊R(A) and whether n-rank . One would like to be able to find a matrix (or matrices) C, such that solutions of (1) are of the form Cb. But if b∉R(A), then (1) has no solution. This will eventually require us to modify our concept of what a solution of (1) is. However, as the applications will illustrate, this is not as unnatural as it sounds. But for now we retain the standard definition of solution. To motivate our first definition of the generalized inverse, consider the functional equation y=ƒ (x),x∈S⊆ℝ, 2 where f is a real-valued function with domain . One procedure for solving (2) is to restrict the domain of f to a smaller set so that is one to one. Then an inverse function from to is defined by if and . Thus is a solution of (2) for . This is how the arcsec, arcsin, and other inverse functions are normally defined. The same procedure can be used in trying to solve equation (1). As usual, we let be the linear function from into defined by for . To make a one to one linear transformation it must be restricted to a subspace complementary to N(A). An obvious one is . This suggests the following definition of the generalized inverse.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1. Basic definitions Equations of the form Ax=b,A∈ ℂm×n ,x∈ ℂn ,b∈ ℂm 1 occur in many pure and applied problems. If and is invertible, then the system of equations (1) is, in principle, easy to solve. The unique solution is . If A is an arbitrary matrix in , then it becomes more difficult to solve (1). There may be none, one, or an infinite number of solutions depending on whether b∊R(A) and whether n-rank . One would like to be able to find a matrix (or matrices) C, such that solutions of (1) are of the form Cb. But if b∉R(A), then (1) has no solution. This will eventually require us to modify our concept of what a solution of (1) is. However, as the applications will illustrate, this is not as unnatural as it sounds. But for now we retain the standard definition of solution. To motivate our first definition of the generalized inverse, consider the functional equation y=ƒ (x),x∈S⊆ℝ, 2 where f is a real-valued function with domain . One procedure for solving (2) is to restrict the domain of f to a smaller set so that is one to one. Then an inverse function from to is defined by if and . Thus is a solution of (2) for . This is how the arcsec, arcsin, and other inverse functions are normally defined. The same procedure can be used in trying to solve equation (1). As usual, we let be the linear function from into defined by for . To make a one to one linear transformation it must be restricted to a subspace complementary to N(A). An obvious one is . This suggests the following definition of the generalized inverse.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1. Basic definitions Equations of the form Ax=b,A∈ ℂm×n ,x∈ ℂn ,b∈ ℂm 1 occur in many pure and applied problems. If and is invertible, then the system of equations (1) is, in principle, easy to solve. The unique solution is . If A is an arbitrary matrix in , then it becomes more difficult to solve (1). There may be none, one, or an infinite number of solutions depending on whether b∊R(A) and whether n-rank . One would like to be able to find a matrix (or matrices) C, such that solutions of (1) are of the form Cb. But if b∉R(A), then (1) has no solution. This will eventually require us to modify our concept of what a solution of (1) is. However, as the applications will illustrate, this is not as unnatural as it sounds. But for now we retain the standard definition of solution. To motivate our first definition of the generalized inverse, consider the functional equation y=ƒ (x),x∈S⊆ℝ, 2 where f is a real-valued function with domain . One procedure for solving (2) is to restrict the domain of f to a smaller set so that is one to one. Then an inverse function from to is defined by if and . Thus is a solution of (2) for . This is how the arcsec, arcsin, and other inverse functions are normally defined. The same procedure can be used in trying to solve equation (1). As usual, we let be the linear function from into defined by for . To make a one to one linear transformation it must be restricted to a subspace complementary to N(A). An obvious one is . This suggests the following definition of the generalized inverse.

Key concepts: Invertible matrix, Inverse, Matrix (chemical analysis), Mathematics, Domain (mathematical analysis), Inverse function, Rank (graph theory), Function (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
1. The Moore—Penrose or Generalized Inverse — Research Paper | ScholarLens