1999•Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluating Housing Policies

Peter Malpass, Alan Murie

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Whatever the explicit or implicit aims of policy, and whatever processes of implementation are involved, the assessment of the outputs of policy are important. In the literature on social policy, evaluations have focused on the distributional impacts of policies on who benefits and who loses and on how these patterns of benefit relate to stated objectives and the language employed to justify policies. Who benefits and who loses as a result of policy not only indicates whether the objectives of the policy concerned are being met. Evaluation of policy also involves consideration of whether there are other unintentional consequences of policy, whether there are wider effects of policy which bring the policy concerned into conflict with other policies and objectives. Furthermore housing policies characteristically involve a multiplicity of objectives. As was argued in Chapter 11, these objectives are often in conflict.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Whatever the explicit or implicit aims of policy, and whatever processes of implementation are involved, the assessment of the outputs of policy are important. In the literature on social policy, evaluations have focused on the distributional impacts of policies on who benefits and who loses and on how these patterns of benefit relate to stated objectives and the language employed to justify policies. Who benefits and who loses as a result of policy not only indicates whether the objectives of the policy concerned are being met. Evaluation of policy also involves consideration of whether there are other unintentional consequences of policy, whether there are wider effects of policy which bring the policy concerned into conflict with other policies and objectives. Furthermore housing policies characteristically involve a multiplicity of objectives. As was argued in Chapter 11, these objectives are often in conflict.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Whatever the explicit or implicit aims of policy, and whatever processes of implementation are involved, the assessment of the outputs of policy are important. In the literature on social policy, evaluations have focused on the distributional impacts of policies on who benefits and who loses and on how these patterns of benefit relate to stated objectives and the language employed to justify policies. Who benefits and who loses as a result of policy not only indicates whether the objectives of the policy concerned are being met. Evaluation of policy also involves consideration of whether there are other unintentional consequences of policy, whether there are wider effects of policy which bring the policy concerned into conflict with other policies and objectives. Furthermore housing policies characteristically involve a multiplicity of objectives. As was argued in Chapter 11, these objectives are often in conflict.

Key concepts: Public economics, Policy analysis, Policy studies, Economics, Public policy, Political science, Public administration, Economic growth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating Housing Policies — Research Paper | ScholarLens