2009•Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Morphology and structural aesthetics: from Goethe to Lévi-Strauss

Jean Petitot

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

In a 1999 article written as a tribute to Claude Lévi-Strauss for a special issue of the French journal Critique , I surveyed Lévi-Strauss's references to Goethe, and this led me to refine the thesis that - as I had already argued in the mid-seventies with regard to René Thom's morphodynamic structuralism - there exists an authentic morphological genealogy of structuralism in the history of ideas. This is the thesis that I will develop in the present essay, taking as an example a pictorial analysis from Lévi-Strauss's Look, Listen, Read (1997). This will enable me to revisit the teachings of a thinker who has left an indelible mark on my intellectual life. The morphological genealogy of structuralism in Claude Lévi-Strauss In his presentation of the aims of this Cambridge Companion, Boris Wiseman recalls Claude Lévi-Strauss's assertion that there were only three structuralists in France: Dumézil, Benvéniste and himself (by the way, for Roman Jakobson there were only five structuralists in the world: Saussure, Prince Troubetskoi, Lévi-Strauss, Thom and himself), and he interprets this as a warning against the temptation to dissolve Lévi-Strauss's thinking in the homogeneous cloud 'structuralism'. Boris Wiseman's remark is well founded. Lévi-Strauss often quite rightly set himself apart from the school of thought which Parisian intellectuals called 'structuralism' before they moved on to 'post-structuralism'. For instance, in his conversation with Didier Eribon (1991b), he drily criticises the 'ridiculous' excesses of the structuralist 'vogue' among the intelligentsia, upbraiding several of his colleagues.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a 1999 article written as a tribute to Claude Lévi-Strauss for a special issue of the French journal Critique , I surveyed Lévi-Strauss's references to Goethe, and this led me to refine the thesis that - as I had already argued in the mid-seventies with regard to René Thom's morphodynamic structuralism - there exists an authentic morphological genealogy of structuralism in the history of ideas. This is the thesis that I will develop in the present essay, taking as an example a pictorial analysis from Lévi-Strauss's Look, Listen, Read (1997). This will enable me to revisit the teachings of a thinker who has left an indelible mark on my intellectual life. The morphological genealogy of structuralism in Claude Lévi-Strauss In his presentation of the aims of this Cambridge Companion, Boris Wiseman recalls Claude Lévi-Strauss's assertion that there were only three structuralists in France: Dumézil, Benvéniste and himself (by the way, for Roman Jakobson there were only five structuralists in the world: Saussure, Prince Troubetskoi, Lévi-Strauss, Thom and himself), and he interprets this as a warning against the temptation to dissolve Lévi-Strauss's thinking in the homogeneous cloud 'structuralism'. Boris Wiseman's remark is well founded. Lévi-Strauss often quite rightly set himself apart from the school of thought which Parisian intellectuals called 'structuralism' before they moved on to 'post-structuralism'. For instance, in his conversation with Didier Eribon (1991b), he drily criticises the 'ridiculous' excesses of the structuralist 'vogue' among the intelligentsia, upbraiding several of his colleagues.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a 1999 article written as a tribute to Claude Lévi-Strauss for a special issue of the French journal Critique , I surveyed Lévi-Strauss's references to Goethe, and this led me to refine the thesis that - as I had already argued in the mid-seventies with regard to René Thom's morphodynamic structuralism - there exists an authentic morphological genealogy of structuralism in the history of ideas. This is the thesis that I will develop in the present essay, taking as an example a pictorial analysis from Lévi-Strauss's Look, Listen, Read (1997). This will enable me to revisit the teachings of a thinker who has left an indelible mark on my intellectual life. The morphological genealogy of structuralism in Claude Lévi-Strauss In his presentation of the aims of this Cambridge Companion, Boris Wiseman recalls Claude Lévi-Strauss's assertion that there were only three structuralists in France: Dumézil, Benvéniste and himself (by the way, for Roman Jakobson there were only five structuralists in the world: Saussure, Prince Troubetskoi, Lévi-Strauss, Thom and himself), and he interprets this as a warning against the temptation to dissolve Lévi-Strauss's thinking in the homogeneous cloud 'structuralism'. Boris Wiseman's remark is well founded. Lévi-Strauss often quite rightly set himself apart from the school of thought which Parisian intellectuals called 'structuralism' before they moved on to 'post-structuralism'. For instance, in his conversation with Didier Eribon (1991b), he drily criticises the 'ridiculous' excesses of the structuralist 'vogue' among the intelligentsia, upbraiding several of his colleagues.

Key concepts: Levi strauss, Structuralism (philosophy of science), Tribute, Philosophy, Morphology (biology), Art history, Art, Humanities

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Morphology and structural aesthetics: from Goethe to Lévi-Strauss — Research Paper | ScholarLens