2016•Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

The Latin American Cases: Bolivia and Peru

Anke Weber, Wesley J. Hiers, Anaïd Flesken

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Bolivia and Peru are highly heterogeneous societies. In Bolivia, the latest census counted 41 percent of the population belonging to any of the 36 recognized indigenous peoples, each with their own language. In Peru, the 2007 Census of Indigenous Communities in the Peruvian Amazon recorded 51 different peoples. Yet despite this heterogeneity, these different groups are often summarized in policy and practice as “the indigenous population.” If any distinction is made, it is according to geographic origin, with the largest groups (the Quechua and Aymara in both countries) traditionally in the countryside of the Andean highlands and a much larger number of smaller peoples in the lowlands of the Amazonian rainforest. And despite this heterogeneity, ethnic politicization has been generally rather low in both countries, yet growing stronger during certain times, in different ways. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Bolivia and Peru are highly heterogeneous societies. In Bolivia, the latest census counted 41 percent of the population belonging to any of the 36 recognized indigenous peoples, each with their own language. In Peru, the 2007 Census of Indigenous Communities in the Peruvian Amazon recorded 51 different peoples. Yet despite this heterogeneity, these different groups are often summarized in policy and practice as “the indigenous population.” If any distinction is made, it is according to geographic origin, with the largest groups (the Quechua and Aymara in both countries) traditionally in the countryside of the Andean highlands and a much larger number of smaller peoples in the lowlands of the Amazonian rainforest. And despite this heterogeneity, ethnic politicization has been generally rather low in both countries, yet growing stronger during certain times, in different ways. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Bolivia and Peru are highly heterogeneous societies. In Bolivia, the latest census counted 41 percent of the population belonging to any of the 36 recognized indigenous peoples, each with their own language. In Peru, the 2007 Census of Indigenous Communities in the Peruvian Amazon recorded 51 different peoples. Yet despite this heterogeneity, these different groups are often summarized in policy and practice as “the indigenous population.” If any distinction is made, it is according to geographic origin, with the largest groups (the Quechua and Aymara in both countries) traditionally in the countryside of the Andean highlands and a much larger number of smaller peoples in the lowlands of the Amazonian rainforest. And despite this heterogeneity, ethnic politicization has been generally rather low in both countries, yet growing stronger during certain times, in different ways. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Indigenous, Amazon rainforest, Latin Americans, Census, Geography, Population, Amazonian, Ethnology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Latin American Cases: Bolivia and Peru — Research Paper | ScholarLens