2004•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Testamentary Law and Probate Jurisdiction

Richard H. Helmholz

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

To English men and women of past centuries, the probate jurisdiction held by the church must have seemed the single most important of its legal privileges. The law of testaments and intestate administration reached into the lives (and pockets) of a large percentage of the English population. It touched family relationships and inter vivos transactions only tangentially related to dying. It meant a great deal to the English civilians; it was the most lucrative thing above anything else they did. It was also a necessary part of the nation's legal system. Probate was the last area of jurisdictional competence to disappear from the act books in the 1640s, and after the revival of the spiritual courts in the 1660s, probate was quickly reinstated. Jurisdiction over testaments remained in the hands of the church into the second half of the 19th century, a longevity that has had consequences with which there is still some degree of struggle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To English men and women of past centuries, the probate jurisdiction held by the church must have seemed the single most important of its legal privileges. The law of testaments and intestate administration reached into the lives (and pockets) of a large percentage of the English population. It touched family relationships and inter vivos transactions only tangentially related to dying. It meant a great deal to the English civilians; it was the most lucrative thing above anything else they did. It was also a necessary part of the nation's legal system. Probate was the last area of jurisdictional competence to disappear from the act books in the 1640s, and after the revival of the spiritual courts in the 1660s, probate was quickly reinstated. Jurisdiction over testaments remained in the hands of the church into the second half of the 19th century, a longevity that has had consequences with which there is still some degree of struggle.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To English men and women of past centuries, the probate jurisdiction held by the church must have seemed the single most important of its legal privileges. The law of testaments and intestate administration reached into the lives (and pockets) of a large percentage of the English population. It touched family relationships and inter vivos transactions only tangentially related to dying. It meant a great deal to the English civilians; it was the most lucrative thing above anything else they did. It was also a necessary part of the nation's legal system. Probate was the last area of jurisdictional competence to disappear from the act books in the 1640s, and after the revival of the spiritual courts in the 1660s, probate was quickly reinstated. Jurisdiction over testaments remained in the hands of the church into the second half of the 19th century, a longevity that has had consequences with which there is still some degree of struggle.

Key concepts: Probate, Jurisdiction, Law, Testamentary trust, Political science, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Testamentary Law and Probate Jurisdiction — Research Paper | ScholarLens