2016•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The Independence and Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice

Dominique Ritleng

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

Abstract The chapter argues that the Court of Justice enjoys an institutional, functional, and social legitimacy. This institutional legitimacy refers to its independence. Its functional legitimacy stems from its work, the Court having managed to position itself as the main agent of the construction of the European legal order. However, judge-led integration arouses the reproach of judicial activism, and hence risks eroding its social legitimacy, i.e. the public support it enjoys. Indeed, the Court of Justice is faced with increasing criticisms, primarily from the Member States. In order to avoid a weakening of its legitimacy, the Court has to respect the telos of the European Union, which is to keep the balance between integration and maintenance of the statehood of the Member States, namely respect for their national constitutional identities and essential state functions. That duty requires specific methods of adjudication which the chapter endeavours to list.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The chapter argues that the Court of Justice enjoys an institutional, functional, and social legitimacy. This institutional legitimacy refers to its independence. Its functional legitimacy stems from its work, the Court having managed to position itself as the main agent of the construction of the European legal order. However, judge-led integration arouses the reproach of judicial activism, and hence risks eroding its social legitimacy, i.e. the public support it enjoys. Indeed, the Court of Justice is faced with increasing criticisms, primarily from the Member States. In order to avoid a weakening of its legitimacy, the Court has to respect the telos of the European Union, which is to keep the balance between integration and maintenance of the statehood of the Member States, namely respect for their national constitutional identities and essential state functions. That duty requires specific methods of adjudication which the chapter endeavours to list.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The chapter argues that the Court of Justice enjoys an institutional, functional, and social legitimacy. This institutional legitimacy refers to its independence. Its functional legitimacy stems from its work, the Court having managed to position itself as the main agent of the construction of the European legal order. However, judge-led integration arouses the reproach of judicial activism, and hence risks eroding its social legitimacy, i.e. the public support it enjoys. Indeed, the Court of Justice is faced with increasing criticisms, primarily from the Member States. In order to avoid a weakening of its legitimacy, the Court has to respect the telos of the European Union, which is to keep the balance between integration and maintenance of the statehood of the Member States, namely respect for their national constitutional identities and essential state functions. That duty requires specific methods of adjudication which the chapter endeavours to list.

Key concepts: Legitimacy, Political science, Adjudication, Law, Duty, Independence (probability theory), European union, Economic Justice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Independence and Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice — Research Paper | ScholarLens