Capitalist and Precapitalist Societies
Larry Patriquin
Abstract
Larry Patriquin
Abstract
What is capitalism? The failure to address this deceptively simple question, perhaps more than anything, has been responsible for generating a number of flawed interpretations of English poor relief. I suggest that most historians of social welfare have an inadequate conception of capitalism which leads them to ignore some of the crucial distinctions between this economic form and previous, peasant-based societies. Capitalism is generally absent in narratives of the transition from ‘past to present’, replaced by expressions such as ‘modernity’ or ‘industrialization’ (E. Wood, 1991, 1994). Capitalism, as a social system, tends to go unexplored, while exploitation, which permeates stratified communities, barely receives comment. A few writers, notably Karl Polanyi, have focused their attention on capitalism, yet there are problems with these approaches as well. Given my argument that one must come to terms with capitalism in order to comprehend the history of support to the English poor, it is necessary, then, to draw out the main features of this mode of production. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
What is capitalism? The failure to address this deceptively simple question, perhaps more than anything, has been responsible for generating a number of flawed interpretations of English poor relief. I suggest that most historians of social welfare have an inadequate conception of capitalism which leads them to ignore some of the crucial distinctions between this economic form and previous, peasant-based societies. Capitalism is generally absent in narratives of the transition from ‘past to present’, replaced by expressions such as ‘modernity’ or ‘industrialization’ (E. Wood, 1991, 1994). Capitalism, as a social system, tends to go unexplored, while exploitation, which permeates stratified communities, barely receives comment. A few writers, notably Karl Polanyi, have focused their attention on capitalism, yet there are problems with these approaches as well. Given my argument that one must come to terms with capitalism in order to comprehend the history of support to the English poor, it is necessary, then, to draw out the main features of this mode of production. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Key concepts: Capitalism, Argument (complex analysis), Peasant, Modernity, Neoclassical economics, Social order, Industrialisation, Order (exchange)