2007•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Capitalist and Precapitalist Societies

Larry Patriquin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

What is capitalism? The failure to address this deceptively simple question, perhaps more than anything, has been responsible for generating a number of flawed interpretations of English poor relief. I suggest that most historians of social welfare have an inadequate conception of capitalism which leads them to ignore some of the crucial distinctions between this economic form and previous, peasant-based societies. Capitalism is generally absent in narratives of the transition from ‘past to present’, replaced by expressions such as ‘modernity’ or ‘industrialization’ (E. Wood, 1991, 1994). Capitalism, as a social system, tends to go unexplored, while exploitation, which permeates stratified communities, barely receives comment. A few writers, notably Karl Polanyi, have focused their attention on capitalism, yet there are problems with these approaches as well. Given my argument that one must come to terms with capitalism in order to comprehend the history of support to the English poor, it is necessary, then, to draw out the main features of this mode of production. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

What is capitalism? The failure to address this deceptively simple question, perhaps more than anything, has been responsible for generating a number of flawed interpretations of English poor relief. I suggest that most historians of social welfare have an inadequate conception of capitalism which leads them to ignore some of the crucial distinctions between this economic form and previous, peasant-based societies. Capitalism is generally absent in narratives of the transition from ‘past to present’, replaced by expressions such as ‘modernity’ or ‘industrialization’ (E. Wood, 1991, 1994). Capitalism, as a social system, tends to go unexplored, while exploitation, which permeates stratified communities, barely receives comment. A few writers, notably Karl Polanyi, have focused their attention on capitalism, yet there are problems with these approaches as well. Given my argument that one must come to terms with capitalism in order to comprehend the history of support to the English poor, it is necessary, then, to draw out the main features of this mode of production. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

What is capitalism? The failure to address this deceptively simple question, perhaps more than anything, has been responsible for generating a number of flawed interpretations of English poor relief. I suggest that most historians of social welfare have an inadequate conception of capitalism which leads them to ignore some of the crucial distinctions between this economic form and previous, peasant-based societies. Capitalism is generally absent in narratives of the transition from ‘past to present’, replaced by expressions such as ‘modernity’ or ‘industrialization’ (E. Wood, 1991, 1994). Capitalism, as a social system, tends to go unexplored, while exploitation, which permeates stratified communities, barely receives comment. A few writers, notably Karl Polanyi, have focused their attention on capitalism, yet there are problems with these approaches as well. Given my argument that one must come to terms with capitalism in order to comprehend the history of support to the English poor, it is necessary, then, to draw out the main features of this mode of production. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Capitalism, Argument (complex analysis), Peasant, Modernity, Neoclassical economics, Social order, Industrialisation, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Capitalist and Precapitalist Societies — Research Paper | ScholarLens