Standard Theism and Naturalism
Graham Oppy
Abstract
Graham Oppy
Abstract
We compare expanded versions of our theories — Standard Theism and Standard Naturalism — on a further range of data. We begin by noting that Standard Theism is trumped by Standard Naturalism on the data considered in the previous chapter. We then consider, in turn: horrendous suffering, salvation, meaning and purpose, and hiddenness and non-belief. We argue that none of the new data that we introduce favours theism over naturalism. We conclude that, given all of the data considered, naturalism trumps theism.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We compare expanded versions of our theories — Standard Theism and Standard Naturalism — on a further range of data. We begin by noting that Standard Theism is trumped by Standard Naturalism on the data considered in the previous chapter. We then consider, in turn: horrendous suffering, salvation, meaning and purpose, and hiddenness and non-belief. We argue that none of the new data that we introduce favours theism over naturalism. We conclude that, given all of the data considered, naturalism trumps theism.
Key concepts: Theism, Naturalism, Philosophy, Epistemology, Meaning (existential)