2013Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Standard Theism and Naturalism

Graham Oppy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We compare expanded versions of our theories — Standard Theism and Standard Naturalism — on a further range of data. We begin by noting that Standard Theism is trumped by Standard Naturalism on the data considered in the previous chapter. We then consider, in turn: horrendous suffering, salvation, meaning and purpose, and hiddenness and non-belief. We argue that none of the new data that we introduce favours theism over naturalism. We conclude that, given all of the data considered, naturalism trumps theism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compare expanded versions of our theories — Standard Theism and Standard Naturalism — on a further range of data. We begin by noting that Standard Theism is trumped by Standard Naturalism on the data considered in the previous chapter. We then consider, in turn: horrendous suffering, salvation, meaning and purpose, and hiddenness and non-belief. We argue that none of the new data that we introduce favours theism over naturalism. We conclude that, given all of the data considered, naturalism trumps theism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compare expanded versions of our theories — Standard Theism and Standard Naturalism — on a further range of data. We begin by noting that Standard Theism is trumped by Standard Naturalism on the data considered in the previous chapter. We then consider, in turn: horrendous suffering, salvation, meaning and purpose, and hiddenness and non-belief. We argue that none of the new data that we introduce favours theism over naturalism. We conclude that, given all of the data considered, naturalism trumps theism.

Key concepts: Theism, Naturalism, Philosophy, Epistemology, Meaning (existential)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Standard Theism and Naturalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens