2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Curriculum and Teacher Development

Jerry Lee Rosiek, D. Jean Clandinin

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

The word ‘curriculum’ is a contested term. It is less a word that refers to a single thing, and more a textual Rorschach test upon which teachers, policymakers and scholars project their own values and ideologies. ‘Curriculum’ is most commonly used as a noun signifying a course of study prescribed through policy-making processes. Once begin looking beyond the mandated curriculum – beyond textbooks and national, state, and provincial standards – for things that children are taught in schools, a myriad of educational effects come into view. Ideas about curriculum considered in this broader sense are as numerous and varied as ideas about the nature of human minds, society and knowledge. Practitioners and scholars readily acknowledge that there is much more going on in classrooms than is specified in mandated curricula; however, common sense ideas about curriculum as a package that can be delivered by teachers to their students like a bulk postal mailing remain difficult to dispel.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The word ‘curriculum’ is a contested term. It is less a word that refers to a single thing, and more a textual Rorschach test upon which teachers, policymakers and scholars project their own values and ideologies. ‘Curriculum’ is most commonly used as a noun signifying a course of study prescribed through policy-making processes. Once begin looking beyond the mandated curriculum – beyond textbooks and national, state, and provincial standards – for things that children are taught in schools, a myriad of educational effects come into view. Ideas about curriculum considered in this broader sense are as numerous and varied as ideas about the nature of human minds, society and knowledge. Practitioners and scholars readily acknowledge that there is much more going on in classrooms than is specified in mandated curricula; however, common sense ideas about curriculum as a package that can be delivered by teachers to their students like a bulk postal mailing remain difficult to dispel.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The word ‘curriculum’ is a contested term. It is less a word that refers to a single thing, and more a textual Rorschach test upon which teachers, policymakers and scholars project their own values and ideologies. ‘Curriculum’ is most commonly used as a noun signifying a course of study prescribed through policy-making processes. Once begin looking beyond the mandated curriculum – beyond textbooks and national, state, and provincial standards – for things that children are taught in schools, a myriad of educational effects come into view. Ideas about curriculum considered in this broader sense are as numerous and varied as ideas about the nature of human minds, society and knowledge. Practitioners and scholars readily acknowledge that there is much more going on in classrooms than is specified in mandated curricula; however, common sense ideas about curriculum as a package that can be delivered by teachers to their students like a bulk postal mailing remain difficult to dispel.

Key concepts: Curriculum, Mathematics education, Psychology, Computer science, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Curriculum and Teacher Development — Research Paper | ScholarLens