2008•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The Comprehensive Nuclear‐Test‐Ban Treaty

Jeffrey S. Lantis

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Struggles over ratification of the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) illustrate the politicization of international agreements, even in an area of so-called high politics where many believe that national security imperatives drive state behavior. Ratification struggles in the United States led that government to reject the treaty in 1999. Other countries, including France, Germany, Australia, and Canada, offered their support for the agreement in spite of dramatically different stances on the issue of stewardship of the nuclear nonproliferation regime. To date, the CTBT has not entered into force, in part because of decisions by select governments not to ratify the agreement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Struggles over ratification of the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) illustrate the politicization of international agreements, even in an area of so-called high politics where many believe that national security imperatives drive state behavior. Ratification struggles in the United States led that government to reject the treaty in 1999. Other countries, including France, Germany, Australia, and Canada, offered their support for the agreement in spite of dramatically different stances on the issue of stewardship of the nuclear nonproliferation regime. To date, the CTBT has not entered into force, in part because of decisions by select governments not to ratify the agreement.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Struggles over ratification of the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) illustrate the politicization of international agreements, even in an area of so-called high politics where many believe that national security imperatives drive state behavior. Ratification struggles in the United States led that government to reject the treaty in 1999. Other countries, including France, Germany, Australia, and Canada, offered their support for the agreement in spite of dramatically different stances on the issue of stewardship of the nuclear nonproliferation regime. To date, the CTBT has not entered into force, in part because of decisions by select governments not to ratify the agreement.

Key concepts: Ratification, Treaty, Stewardship (theology), Political science, Nuclear weapon, Test (biology), Government (linguistics), State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Comprehensive Nuclear‐Test‐Ban Treaty — Research Paper | ScholarLens