2013Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Members, Goals, Resources, and Strategies

Steven S. Smith, Jason M. Roberts, Ryan J. Vander Wielen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In today’s world, we make several reasonable assumptions about members of Congress. We assume that most of them will seek reelection, and, if they do not, it is because they are seeking another elective office or are retiring. We expect that legislators have the ability to get back to their districts and states on most weekends to attend civic functions and meet with constituents. We take for granted that legislators can communicate efficiently with constituents, resolve constituent problems, and meanwhile address the policy concerns of House districts that average about 711,000 people and states that average more than 6 million people. These assumptions are fairly accurate, but Congress has not always been this way. Only in the past few decades have legislators consistently sought reelection. In the late 1800s, it was common for two-thirds or less of House members to run for reelection. Even in the 1940s, two out of ten legislators sat out the next election. In recent Congresses, however, 90 to 95 percent of incumbents have run for reelection. Moreover, the technology, resources, and staff required to make frequent trips home and to be responsive to ever-expanding constituencies are of recent vintage. Since the 1950s, office budgets have quadrupled and personal staffs have doubled in size. This chapter looks at Congress from the members’ perspective. Legislators exhibit a range of personal goals, but most modern legislators see politics as a career and view reelection as essential to the achievement of their goals. Over time, they have granted themselves the resources to pursue their electoral, policy, and other objectives simultaneously. Legislators, however, do not pursue all goals all the time, but exploit resources and opportunities selectively. We will see that there are important patterns and generalizations that can be made.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In today’s world, we make several reasonable assumptions about members of Congress. We assume that most of them will seek reelection, and, if they do not, it is because they are seeking another elective office or are retiring. We expect that legislators have the ability to get back to their districts and states on most weekends to attend civic functions and meet with constituents. We take for granted that legislators can communicate efficiently with constituents, resolve constituent problems, and meanwhile address the policy concerns of House districts that average about 711,000 people and states that average more than 6 million people. These assumptions are fairly accurate, but Congress has not always been this way. Only in the past few decades have legislators consistently sought reelection. In the late 1800s, it was common for two-thirds or less of House members to run for reelection. Even in the 1940s, two out of ten legislators sat out the next election. In recent Congresses, however, 90 to 95 percent of incumbents have run for reelection. Moreover, the technology, resources, and staff required to make frequent trips home and to be responsive to ever-expanding constituencies are of recent vintage. Since the 1950s, office budgets have quadrupled and personal staffs have doubled in size. This chapter looks at Congress from the members’ perspective. Legislators exhibit a range of personal goals, but most modern legislators see politics as a career and view reelection as essential to the achievement of their goals. Over time, they have granted themselves the resources to pursue their electoral, policy, and other objectives simultaneously. Legislators, however, do not pursue all goals all the time, but exploit resources and opportunities selectively. We will see that there are important patterns and generalizations that can be made.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In today’s world, we make several reasonable assumptions about members of Congress. We assume that most of them will seek reelection, and, if they do not, it is because they are seeking another elective office or are retiring. We expect that legislators have the ability to get back to their districts and states on most weekends to attend civic functions and meet with constituents. We take for granted that legislators can communicate efficiently with constituents, resolve constituent problems, and meanwhile address the policy concerns of House districts that average about 711,000 people and states that average more than 6 million people. These assumptions are fairly accurate, but Congress has not always been this way. Only in the past few decades have legislators consistently sought reelection. In the late 1800s, it was common for two-thirds or less of House members to run for reelection. Even in the 1940s, two out of ten legislators sat out the next election. In recent Congresses, however, 90 to 95 percent of incumbents have run for reelection. Moreover, the technology, resources, and staff required to make frequent trips home and to be responsive to ever-expanding constituencies are of recent vintage. Since the 1950s, office budgets have quadrupled and personal staffs have doubled in size. This chapter looks at Congress from the members’ perspective. Legislators exhibit a range of personal goals, but most modern legislators see politics as a career and view reelection as essential to the achievement of their goals. Over time, they have granted themselves the resources to pursue their electoral, policy, and other objectives simultaneously. Legislators, however, do not pursue all goals all the time, but exploit resources and opportunities selectively. We will see that there are important patterns and generalizations that can be made.

Key concepts: Public relations, Political science, Business, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Members, Goals, Resources, and Strategies — Research Paper | ScholarLens