2009•Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

The U.S. Military and Public Diplomacy

Abiodun Williams

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Can and should the U.S. military, which wields the tools of “hard power,” engage in “soft power” initiatives such as the practice of public diplomacy? The U.S. Department of Defense’s (DOD) mission is to organize, train, and equip the nation’s military forces to prevent war and protect the security of the country. However, the geopolitical realities of a long asymmetric war against extremism, and the emerging threats from ungoverned and undergoverned areas around the globe, pose important challenges for protecting U.S. national security. Ensuring national security is no longer merely a matter of defending borders and patrolling oceans and skies, but requires reconstruction and stabilization efforts, building partnerships, and improving the U.S. image abroad. Moreover, the traditional tools of hard power are insufficient to meet the foreign policy demands of the twenty-first century, and soft power is reemerging as a vital component of foreign policy. Indeed, the challenge is to integrate hard and soft power—“smart power” 1 —to achieve foreign policy goals. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Can and should the U.S. military, which wields the tools of “hard power,” engage in “soft power” initiatives such as the practice of public diplomacy? The U.S. Department of Defense’s (DOD) mission is to organize, train, and equip the nation’s military forces to prevent war and protect the security of the country. However, the geopolitical realities of a long asymmetric war against extremism, and the emerging threats from ungoverned and undergoverned areas around the globe, pose important challenges for protecting U.S. national security. Ensuring national security is no longer merely a matter of defending borders and patrolling oceans and skies, but requires reconstruction and stabilization efforts, building partnerships, and improving the U.S. image abroad. Moreover, the traditional tools of hard power are insufficient to meet the foreign policy demands of the twenty-first century, and soft power is reemerging as a vital component of foreign policy. Indeed, the challenge is to integrate hard and soft power—“smart power” 1 —to achieve foreign policy goals. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Can and should the U.S. military, which wields the tools of “hard power,” engage in “soft power” initiatives such as the practice of public diplomacy? The U.S. Department of Defense’s (DOD) mission is to organize, train, and equip the nation’s military forces to prevent war and protect the security of the country. However, the geopolitical realities of a long asymmetric war against extremism, and the emerging threats from ungoverned and undergoverned areas around the globe, pose important challenges for protecting U.S. national security. Ensuring national security is no longer merely a matter of defending borders and patrolling oceans and skies, but requires reconstruction and stabilization efforts, building partnerships, and improving the U.S. image abroad. Moreover, the traditional tools of hard power are insufficient to meet the foreign policy demands of the twenty-first century, and soft power is reemerging as a vital component of foreign policy. Indeed, the challenge is to integrate hard and soft power—“smart power” 1 —to achieve foreign policy goals. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Diplomacy, Political science, Public diplomacy, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The U.S. Military and Public Diplomacy — Research Paper | ScholarLens