2014Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

MHD stability comparison theorems

J. P. Freidberg

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction Three models have been introduced to investigate the MHD equilibrium and stability properties of a general multidimensional magnetic fusion configuration: ideal MHD, kinetic MHD, and double adiabatic MHD. Ideal MHD is by far the most widely used model although there is concern since the collision dominated assumption used in the derivation is not satisfied in fusion-grade plasmas. The collisionless kinetic MHD model provides the most reliable description of the physics but is difficult to solve in realistic geometries because of the complex kinetic behavior parallel to the magnetic field. Double adiabatic MHD is a collisionless fluid model that is much easier to solve than kinetic MHD but the closure assumptions cannot be justified by any rigorous mathematical or physical arguments. Based on this assessment one sees that the situation is not very satisfactory from a theoretical point of view. In practice, ideal MHD, because of its mathematical simplicity, is the model that is most widely used to design, predict, and interpret fusion experiments. Many years of experience have shown, perhaps surprisingly, that the model is far more accurate and reliable than one might have anticipated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction Three models have been introduced to investigate the MHD equilibrium and stability properties of a general multidimensional magnetic fusion configuration: ideal MHD, kinetic MHD, and double adiabatic MHD. Ideal MHD is by far the most widely used model although there is concern since the collision dominated assumption used in the derivation is not satisfied in fusion-grade plasmas. The collisionless kinetic MHD model provides the most reliable description of the physics but is difficult to solve in realistic geometries because of the complex kinetic behavior parallel to the magnetic field. Double adiabatic MHD is a collisionless fluid model that is much easier to solve than kinetic MHD but the closure assumptions cannot be justified by any rigorous mathematical or physical arguments. Based on this assessment one sees that the situation is not very satisfactory from a theoretical point of view. In practice, ideal MHD, because of its mathematical simplicity, is the model that is most widely used to design, predict, and interpret fusion experiments. Many years of experience have shown, perhaps surprisingly, that the model is far more accurate and reliable than one might have anticipated.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction Three models have been introduced to investigate the MHD equilibrium and stability properties of a general multidimensional magnetic fusion configuration: ideal MHD, kinetic MHD, and double adiabatic MHD. Ideal MHD is by far the most widely used model although there is concern since the collision dominated assumption used in the derivation is not satisfied in fusion-grade plasmas. The collisionless kinetic MHD model provides the most reliable description of the physics but is difficult to solve in realistic geometries because of the complex kinetic behavior parallel to the magnetic field. Double adiabatic MHD is a collisionless fluid model that is much easier to solve than kinetic MHD but the closure assumptions cannot be justified by any rigorous mathematical or physical arguments. Based on this assessment one sees that the situation is not very satisfactory from a theoretical point of view. In practice, ideal MHD, because of its mathematical simplicity, is the model that is most widely used to design, predict, and interpret fusion experiments. Many years of experience have shown, perhaps surprisingly, that the model is far more accurate and reliable than one might have anticipated.

Key concepts: Magnetohydrodynamics, Adiabatic process, Physics, Kinetic energy, Classical mechanics, Magnetic field, Stability (learning theory), Ideal (ethics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
MHD stability comparison theorems — Research Paper | ScholarLens