2012Unpublished venueRequires access

The HJM Forward Rate Model

Sanjay K. Nawalkha, Natalia A. Beliaeva, Gloria M. Soto

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The forward rate models typically assume historical forward rate volatilities and an initially observed set of forward rates as model inputs the forward rate models of Heath, Jarrow, and Morton (HJM), the LIBOR market model (LMM), and the String model are preference free by construction. Since, these models exogenously specify the forward rate process, which uniquely determines the risk-neutral short rate process without requiring the specification of market prices of risks, preferences do not enter into the valuation process. It is conceptualized as double-plus HJM models, which do not impose any restrictions on the functional form of the initially observed forward rates but allow only specific functional forms for the forward rate volatility function. But such classification of existing preference-free term structure models as “HJM models” serves little purpose, especially when many of these models have been derived independently by other researchers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The forward rate models typically assume historical forward rate volatilities and an initially observed set of forward rates as model inputs the forward rate models of Heath, Jarrow, and Morton (HJM), the LIBOR market model (LMM), and the String model are preference free by construction. Since, these models exogenously specify the forward rate process, which uniquely determines the risk-neutral short rate process without requiring the specification of market prices of risks, preferences do not enter into the valuation process. It is conceptualized as double-plus HJM models, which do not impose any restrictions on the functional form of the initially observed forward rates but allow only specific functional forms for the forward rate volatility function. But such classification of existing preference-free term structure models as “HJM models” serves little purpose, especially when many of these models have been derived independently by other researchers.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The forward rate models typically assume historical forward rate volatilities and an initially observed set of forward rates as model inputs the forward rate models of Heath, Jarrow, and Morton (HJM), the LIBOR market model (LMM), and the String model are preference free by construction. Since, these models exogenously specify the forward rate process, which uniquely determines the risk-neutral short rate process without requiring the specification of market prices of risks, preferences do not enter into the valuation process. It is conceptualized as double-plus HJM models, which do not impose any restrictions on the functional form of the initially observed forward rates but allow only specific functional forms for the forward rate volatility function. But such classification of existing preference-free term structure models as “HJM models” serves little purpose, especially when many of these models have been derived independently by other researchers.

Key concepts: Heath–Jarrow–Morton framework, Forward rate, LIBOR market model, Econometrics, Valuation (finance), Volatility (finance), Libor, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The HJM Forward Rate Model — Research Paper | ScholarLens