2013Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Sources of Social Ecology — Discourses on Society and Nature in Sociology

Karl Bruckmeier

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Environmental themes are analysed in several sociological subdisciplines, but only two of these are relevant to social ecology’s themes: environmental sociology with the investigation of natural resource use and environmental problems, and rural sociology with the investigation of land use and food production. The questions of society—nature interaction that guide social ecology appear in sociology with its many subdisciplinary specialisations as big philosophical questions that can be interpreted and answered in many different ways, as the continuing controversies in the ecological discourse show. The history and development of environmental and rural sociology with its themes, perspectives and theories is documented in recent handbooks (for environmental sociology see Redclift and Woodgate 2010; for rural sociology see Cloke et al. 2006). The following discussion does not aim to review the development of the subdisciplines, but is selective according to the core problems and themes of social ecology. The mass of specialised research in environmental sociology — on environmental awareness and behaviour, environmental movements, environmental policy, conflicts and risks — is not the knowledge that is driving the thematic research in social ecology. That knowledge is structured in the three guiding concepts of analysing nature—society interaction and in complicated notions of “societal action”.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Environmental themes are analysed in several sociological subdisciplines, but only two of these are relevant to social ecology’s themes: environmental sociology with the investigation of natural resource use and environmental problems, and rural sociology with the investigation of land use and food production. The questions of society—nature interaction that guide social ecology appear in sociology with its many subdisciplinary specialisations as big philosophical questions that can be interpreted and answered in many different ways, as the continuing controversies in the ecological discourse show. The history and development of environmental and rural sociology with its themes, perspectives and theories is documented in recent handbooks (for environmental sociology see Redclift and Woodgate 2010; for rural sociology see Cloke et al. 2006). The following discussion does not aim to review the development of the subdisciplines, but is selective according to the core problems and themes of social ecology. The mass of specialised research in environmental sociology — on environmental awareness and behaviour, environmental movements, environmental policy, conflicts and risks — is not the knowledge that is driving the thematic research in social ecology. That knowledge is structured in the three guiding concepts of analysing nature—society interaction and in complicated notions of “societal action”.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Environmental themes are analysed in several sociological subdisciplines, but only two of these are relevant to social ecology’s themes: environmental sociology with the investigation of natural resource use and environmental problems, and rural sociology with the investigation of land use and food production. The questions of society—nature interaction that guide social ecology appear in sociology with its many subdisciplinary specialisations as big philosophical questions that can be interpreted and answered in many different ways, as the continuing controversies in the ecological discourse show. The history and development of environmental and rural sociology with its themes, perspectives and theories is documented in recent handbooks (for environmental sociology see Redclift and Woodgate 2010; for rural sociology see Cloke et al. 2006). The following discussion does not aim to review the development of the subdisciplines, but is selective according to the core problems and themes of social ecology. The mass of specialised research in environmental sociology — on environmental awareness and behaviour, environmental movements, environmental policy, conflicts and risks — is not the knowledge that is driving the thematic research in social ecology. That knowledge is structured in the three guiding concepts of analysing nature—society interaction and in complicated notions of “societal action”.

Key concepts: Environmental sociology, Sociology, Environmental social science, Social science, Social ecology, Ecology, Environmental ethics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sources of Social Ecology — Discourses on Society and Nature in Sociology — Research Paper | ScholarLens