Against Negligence Liability
Larry Alexander, Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
Abstract
Larry Alexander, Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
Abstract
This chapter presents arguments against negligence liability. It explains why negligence is not culpable and discusses failed attempts to narrow negligence as well as the arbitrariness of the reasonable person test. The chapter includes comments by some of the nation's top legal scholars from the field of criminal law, tackling topics such as criminal responsibility, whether negligence is blameless, cognitive science and contextual negligence liability, and the distinction between negligence and recklessness.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter presents arguments against negligence liability. It explains why negligence is not culpable and discusses failed attempts to narrow negligence as well as the arbitrariness of the reasonable person test. The chapter includes comments by some of the nation's top legal scholars from the field of criminal law, tackling topics such as criminal responsibility, whether negligence is blameless, cognitive science and contextual negligence liability, and the distinction between negligence and recklessness.
Key concepts: Liability, Business, Accounting