2011Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

East Asian Currency Union

Robert J. Barro, Jong‐Wha Lee

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

A currency union has been suggested for East Asia. The chapter analyzes the feasibility of various types of unions, such as a dollar bloc, euro bloc, yen bloc, and basket currency and assess the welfare effects for East Asian economies. Judging from optimum currency area (OCA) criteria, including the symmetry of output and price shocks across countries, commitment to price stability, and trade and financial integration, East Asia does not have highly favorable economic conditions for a currency union, particularly when compared to the euro area. The low political proximity between Japan and other East Asian economies impedes Japan’s leadership in the creation of an East Asian currency union. For most countries in East Asia, a currency union involving a broad group of economies would result in a net welfare gain due to trade creation. However, if the increased volatility due to the loss of monetary policy independence generates a significantly negative effect on growth, the larger East Asian economies such as the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Indonesia, and Japan may suffer a net welfare loss. A substantial welfare gain from joining an East Asian currency union would occur if a currency union lowers the probability and size of disasters such as wars and financial crises in East Asia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A currency union has been suggested for East Asia. The chapter analyzes the feasibility of various types of unions, such as a dollar bloc, euro bloc, yen bloc, and basket currency and assess the welfare effects for East Asian economies. Judging from optimum currency area (OCA) criteria, including the symmetry of output and price shocks across countries, commitment to price stability, and trade and financial integration, East Asia does not have highly favorable economic conditions for a currency union, particularly when compared to the euro area. The low political proximity between Japan and other East Asian economies impedes Japan’s leadership in the creation of an East Asian currency union. For most countries in East Asia, a currency union involving a broad group of economies would result in a net welfare gain due to trade creation. However, if the increased volatility due to the loss of monetary policy independence generates a significantly negative effect on growth, the larger East Asian economies such as the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Indonesia, and Japan may suffer a net welfare loss. A substantial welfare gain from joining an East Asian currency union would occur if a currency union lowers the probability and size of disasters such as wars and financial crises in East Asia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A currency union has been suggested for East Asia. The chapter analyzes the feasibility of various types of unions, such as a dollar bloc, euro bloc, yen bloc, and basket currency and assess the welfare effects for East Asian economies. Judging from optimum currency area (OCA) criteria, including the symmetry of output and price shocks across countries, commitment to price stability, and trade and financial integration, East Asia does not have highly favorable economic conditions for a currency union, particularly when compared to the euro area. The low political proximity between Japan and other East Asian economies impedes Japan’s leadership in the creation of an East Asian currency union. For most countries in East Asia, a currency union involving a broad group of economies would result in a net welfare gain due to trade creation. However, if the increased volatility due to the loss of monetary policy independence generates a significantly negative effect on growth, the larger East Asian economies such as the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Indonesia, and Japan may suffer a net welfare loss. A substantial welfare gain from joining an East Asian currency union would occur if a currency union lowers the probability and size of disasters such as wars and financial crises in East Asia.

Key concepts: East Asia, Devaluation, Reserve currency, International economics, Economics, Currency, Currency union, Foreign-exchange reserves

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
East Asian Currency Union — Research Paper | ScholarLens