2003Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Decentralization and Poverty Reduction

Raghav Gaiha

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

The term “decentralization” has been variously used to refer to the privatization, deconcentration, or devolution of political, administrative, and fiscal powers. Decentralization as used here, however, refers only to devolution, whether or not powers are transferred simultaneously or in varying degrees. This chapter focuses on whether decentralization has helped the poor in asia, and on the mechanisms through which the poor have benefited. Although several asian countries have experimented with decentralization, experiences have varied considerably in their extent, forms and outcomes. I several cases, the political dimension was dominant, with changing political circumstances and coalitions shaping the process of decentralization in important ways. By contrast, economic conditions were less crucial in decisions to decentralize. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The term “decentralization” has been variously used to refer to the privatization, deconcentration, or devolution of political, administrative, and fiscal powers. Decentralization as used here, however, refers only to devolution, whether or not powers are transferred simultaneously or in varying degrees. This chapter focuses on whether decentralization has helped the poor in asia, and on the mechanisms through which the poor have benefited. Although several asian countries have experimented with decentralization, experiences have varied considerably in their extent, forms and outcomes. I several cases, the political dimension was dominant, with changing political circumstances and coalitions shaping the process of decentralization in important ways. By contrast, economic conditions were less crucial in decisions to decentralize. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The term “decentralization” has been variously used to refer to the privatization, deconcentration, or devolution of political, administrative, and fiscal powers. Decentralization as used here, however, refers only to devolution, whether or not powers are transferred simultaneously or in varying degrees. This chapter focuses on whether decentralization has helped the poor in asia, and on the mechanisms through which the poor have benefited. Although several asian countries have experimented with decentralization, experiences have varied considerably in their extent, forms and outcomes. I several cases, the political dimension was dominant, with changing political circumstances and coalitions shaping the process of decentralization in important ways. By contrast, economic conditions were less crucial in decisions to decentralize. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Decentralization, Devolution (biology), Politics, Political science, Poverty, Economic system, Poverty reduction, Development economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Decentralization and Poverty Reduction — Research Paper | ScholarLens