Decentralization and Poverty Reduction
Raghav Gaiha
Abstract
Raghav Gaiha
Abstract
The term “decentralization” has been variously used to refer to the privatization, deconcentration, or devolution of political, administrative, and fiscal powers. Decentralization as used here, however, refers only to devolution, whether or not powers are transferred simultaneously or in varying degrees. This chapter focuses on whether decentralization has helped the poor in asia, and on the mechanisms through which the poor have benefited. Although several asian countries have experimented with decentralization, experiences have varied considerably in their extent, forms and outcomes. I several cases, the political dimension was dominant, with changing political circumstances and coalitions shaping the process of decentralization in important ways. By contrast, economic conditions were less crucial in decisions to decentralize. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The term “decentralization” has been variously used to refer to the privatization, deconcentration, or devolution of political, administrative, and fiscal powers. Decentralization as used here, however, refers only to devolution, whether or not powers are transferred simultaneously or in varying degrees. This chapter focuses on whether decentralization has helped the poor in asia, and on the mechanisms through which the poor have benefited. Although several asian countries have experimented with decentralization, experiences have varied considerably in their extent, forms and outcomes. I several cases, the political dimension was dominant, with changing political circumstances and coalitions shaping the process of decentralization in important ways. By contrast, economic conditions were less crucial in decisions to decentralize. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Key concepts: Decentralization, Devolution (biology), Politics, Political science, Poverty, Economic system, Poverty reduction, Development economics