2013Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Discussion of Qualitative Interviewing

Svend Brinkmann

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This concluding chapter sums up the topics discussed in the book. It first presents some points of criticism that are often raised against qualitative interviewing. Some of these are raised from people outside the world of qualitative research as such, while others are raised by insiders to qualitative inquiry. The chapter then discusses different strategies for evaluating qualitative interview research. How should readers of interview studies assess what they read? Is it possible to articulate criteria for quality in relation to interviewing, and if so, which ones are relevant?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This concluding chapter sums up the topics discussed in the book. It first presents some points of criticism that are often raised against qualitative interviewing. Some of these are raised from people outside the world of qualitative research as such, while others are raised by insiders to qualitative inquiry. The chapter then discusses different strategies for evaluating qualitative interview research. How should readers of interview studies assess what they read? Is it possible to articulate criteria for quality in relation to interviewing, and if so, which ones are relevant?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This concluding chapter sums up the topics discussed in the book. It first presents some points of criticism that are often raised against qualitative interviewing. Some of these are raised from people outside the world of qualitative research as such, while others are raised by insiders to qualitative inquiry. The chapter then discusses different strategies for evaluating qualitative interview research. How should readers of interview studies assess what they read? Is it possible to articulate criteria for quality in relation to interviewing, and if so, which ones are relevant?

Key concepts: Interview, Qualitative research, Criticism, Relation (database), Quality (philosophy), Psychology, Qualitative analysis, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discussion of Qualitative Interviewing — Research Paper | ScholarLens