1996•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Modernity, Nationalism and Religious Fundamentalism

Shivesh Chandra Thakur

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The two terms most commonly used to describe the various forms of religious activism evident around the world today are ‘religious fundamentalism’ and ‘religious nationalism’. Some might prefer to use just one of these as an all-inclusive ‘umbrella-word’.1 I am of the opinion that both are needed, each in its appropriate context; for each of these has connotations which the other does not; and, if the resurgence of religion, globally, is to be captured in its entirety, as far as possible, then both sets of the connotations need to be retained. I wish to start by talking about ‘fundamentalism’ first, postponing the consideration of ‘nationalism’ and ‘modernity’ for a little while. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The two terms most commonly used to describe the various forms of religious activism evident around the world today are ‘religious fundamentalism’ and ‘religious nationalism’. Some might prefer to use just one of these as an all-inclusive ‘umbrella-word’.1 I am of the opinion that both are needed, each in its appropriate context; for each of these has connotations which the other does not; and, if the resurgence of religion, globally, is to be captured in its entirety, as far as possible, then both sets of the connotations need to be retained. I wish to start by talking about ‘fundamentalism’ first, postponing the consideration of ‘nationalism’ and ‘modernity’ for a little while. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The two terms most commonly used to describe the various forms of religious activism evident around the world today are ‘religious fundamentalism’ and ‘religious nationalism’. Some might prefer to use just one of these as an all-inclusive ‘umbrella-word’.1 I am of the opinion that both are needed, each in its appropriate context; for each of these has connotations which the other does not; and, if the resurgence of religion, globally, is to be captured in its entirety, as far as possible, then both sets of the connotations need to be retained. I wish to start by talking about ‘fundamentalism’ first, postponing the consideration of ‘nationalism’ and ‘modernity’ for a little while. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Fundamentalism, Nationalism, Modernity, Context (archaeology), Religious studies, Aesthetics, Sociology, Islamic fundamentalism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modernity, Nationalism and Religious Fundamentalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens