2012Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Whose Consciousness? The Illusory Self

Jesse Prinz

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Many authors, including Descartes and Kant, have assumed that the self is somehow presented to us in experience. Those who believe in a phenomenal self sometimes try to reduce it to something else, such as an experience of the body, while others think it is irreducible. Following Hume, this chapter argues against both options, claiming that there is no phenomenal self—or more accurately, the self cannot be experience as a subject, but only as an object, such as a body. Philosophical arguments and neuroscientific evidence for a phenomenal self is critically reviewed. Phenomena considered include: feelings of ownership and authorship, the feeling of losing oneself, the experience of one’s body as a self, and the alleged role of the self in conscious unity. None of these phenomena establish a phenomenal self. The chapter ends by suggesting that the self may nevertheless be implicit, rather than explicit, in experience.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many authors, including Descartes and Kant, have assumed that the self is somehow presented to us in experience. Those who believe in a phenomenal self sometimes try to reduce it to something else, such as an experience of the body, while others think it is irreducible. Following Hume, this chapter argues against both options, claiming that there is no phenomenal self—or more accurately, the self cannot be experience as a subject, but only as an object, such as a body. Philosophical arguments and neuroscientific evidence for a phenomenal self is critically reviewed. Phenomena considered include: feelings of ownership and authorship, the feeling of losing oneself, the experience of one’s body as a self, and the alleged role of the self in conscious unity. None of these phenomena establish a phenomenal self. The chapter ends by suggesting that the self may nevertheless be implicit, rather than explicit, in experience.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many authors, including Descartes and Kant, have assumed that the self is somehow presented to us in experience. Those who believe in a phenomenal self sometimes try to reduce it to something else, such as an experience of the body, while others think it is irreducible. Following Hume, this chapter argues against both options, claiming that there is no phenomenal self—or more accurately, the self cannot be experience as a subject, but only as an object, such as a body. Philosophical arguments and neuroscientific evidence for a phenomenal self is critically reviewed. Phenomena considered include: feelings of ownership and authorship, the feeling of losing oneself, the experience of one’s body as a self, and the alleged role of the self in conscious unity. None of these phenomena establish a phenomenal self. The chapter ends by suggesting that the self may nevertheless be implicit, rather than explicit, in experience.

Key concepts: Feeling, Self-consciousness, Self, Consciousness, Object (grammar), Subject (documents), Psychology, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Whose Consciousness? The Illusory Self — Research Paper | ScholarLens