Hegel and the End of History
Rüdiger Bubner
Abstract
Rüdiger Bubner
Abstract
In what follows Hegel's philosophy of history as the zenith in historical thinking will be considered from three perspectives. I I will begin by discussing the two major reactions among Hegel's nineteenth century successors to the problem of historical finality. II Then I will go back to Hegel himself in order the analyze the speculative claims of his system with regard to historical time. III And finally, I will clarify the role played by those formal structures in historical reflexion which continue to fuel the controversy over what Hegel meant by the end of history.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In what follows Hegel's philosophy of history as the zenith in historical thinking will be considered from three perspectives. I I will begin by discussing the two major reactions among Hegel's nineteenth century successors to the problem of historical finality. II Then I will go back to Hegel himself in order the analyze the speculative claims of his system with regard to historical time. III And finally, I will clarify the role played by those formal structures in historical reflexion which continue to fuel the controversy over what Hegel meant by the end of history.
Key concepts: Hegelianism, Philosophy of history, Philosophy, Epistemology, Order (exchange), End of history, Reflexive pronoun, Literature