2014•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity

Dan Zahavi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter starts Part II by pointing to the following challenge: Isn’t the notion of an experiential self overly Cartesian, and doesn’t a strong emphasis on the first-personal character of consciousness prohibit a satisfactory account of intersubjectivity? To really allow for the latter shouldn’t one rather argue for the co-constitution of self and other, or perhaps opt for the view that one only obtains the self-relation constitutive of selfhood by being socialized into a publicly shared space of normativity? The merit of this objection is considered, and the origin of the very notion of ‘intersubjectivity’ is briefly outlined. It is then proposed, and this is pursued in the remainder of Part II, that the notion of an experiential self, rather than preventing a satisfactory solution to the problem of other minds, is in fact a precondition for a reasonable account of intersubjectivity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter starts Part II by pointing to the following challenge: Isn’t the notion of an experiential self overly Cartesian, and doesn’t a strong emphasis on the first-personal character of consciousness prohibit a satisfactory account of intersubjectivity? To really allow for the latter shouldn’t one rather argue for the co-constitution of self and other, or perhaps opt for the view that one only obtains the self-relation constitutive of selfhood by being socialized into a publicly shared space of normativity? The merit of this objection is considered, and the origin of the very notion of ‘intersubjectivity’ is briefly outlined. It is then proposed, and this is pursued in the remainder of Part II, that the notion of an experiential self, rather than preventing a satisfactory solution to the problem of other minds, is in fact a precondition for a reasonable account of intersubjectivity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter starts Part II by pointing to the following challenge: Isn’t the notion of an experiential self overly Cartesian, and doesn’t a strong emphasis on the first-personal character of consciousness prohibit a satisfactory account of intersubjectivity? To really allow for the latter shouldn’t one rather argue for the co-constitution of self and other, or perhaps opt for the view that one only obtains the self-relation constitutive of selfhood by being socialized into a publicly shared space of normativity? The merit of this objection is considered, and the origin of the very notion of ‘intersubjectivity’ is briefly outlined. It is then proposed, and this is pursued in the remainder of Part II, that the notion of an experiential self, rather than preventing a satisfactory solution to the problem of other minds, is in fact a precondition for a reasonable account of intersubjectivity.

Key concepts: Intersubjectivity, Subjectivity, Epistemology, Relation (database), Consciousness, Experiential learning, Constitution, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity — Research Paper | ScholarLens