2012Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Conceptions of the Text

Anders Pettersson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Those who theorize about literature do not normally doubt that readers can carry out what I call application or that they do so often. However, as I have emphasized repeatedly, many regard application as irrelevant from a purely literary point of view. One important motivation for such criticism is the idea that (i) literary values must be found in the text itself and (ii) application does not lead to the realization of such values. This line of reasoning underlies what I have called the textual-supremacy argument against application. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Those who theorize about literature do not normally doubt that readers can carry out what I call application or that they do so often. However, as I have emphasized repeatedly, many regard application as irrelevant from a purely literary point of view. One important motivation for such criticism is the idea that (i) literary values must be found in the text itself and (ii) application does not lead to the realization of such values. This line of reasoning underlies what I have called the textual-supremacy argument against application. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Those who theorize about literature do not normally doubt that readers can carry out what I call application or that they do so often. However, as I have emphasized repeatedly, many regard application as irrelevant from a purely literary point of view. One important motivation for such criticism is the idea that (i) literary values must be found in the text itself and (ii) application does not lead to the realization of such values. This line of reasoning underlies what I have called the textual-supremacy argument against application. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Argument (complex analysis), Realization (probability), Criticism, Point (geometry), Epistemology, Literary criticism, Carry (investment), Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conceptions of the Text — Research Paper | ScholarLens