1996•Unpublished venueRequires access

Agriculture and Anarchy: A Marxist Reading of ‘Snowed Up’

Jessica Maynard

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Any introduction to the thought of Karl Marx should, perhaps, begin with the concept of the ‘dialectic’. Dialectic was the term used by Marx and Engels to describe their theory of social change, which occurred, according to Marxist theory, as a result of class struggle. This conflict itself was a result of the social formations which emerged out of the forms of economic production prevalent in any given society. Society was envisaged as passing through several phases, designated by Marx, the ‘antique’, ‘feudal’ and ‘bourgeois’. In the bourgeois phase — the nineteenth century about which Marx and Engels were writing — it was the capitalist mode of production which prevailed. According to this system, the means of production (the factories, the land, the machines and so on) were owned and controlled by one class (the bourgeoisie), although that class depended on the labour of another class (the proletariat) to maintain production. However, the proletariat received very little of the profits of their labour, these instead being appropriated by the owners and ploughed back into the capitalist machine. Marx referred to this as ‘alienation’, since the workers were alienated from the end result of the production process — and not simply in terms of profit, but also in terms of working conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Any introduction to the thought of Karl Marx should, perhaps, begin with the concept of the ‘dialectic’. Dialectic was the term used by Marx and Engels to describe their theory of social change, which occurred, according to Marxist theory, as a result of class struggle. This conflict itself was a result of the social formations which emerged out of the forms of economic production prevalent in any given society. Society was envisaged as passing through several phases, designated by Marx, the ‘antique’, ‘feudal’ and ‘bourgeois’. In the bourgeois phase — the nineteenth century about which Marx and Engels were writing — it was the capitalist mode of production which prevailed. According to this system, the means of production (the factories, the land, the machines and so on) were owned and controlled by one class (the bourgeoisie), although that class depended on the labour of another class (the proletariat) to maintain production. However, the proletariat received very little of the profits of their labour, these instead being appropriated by the owners and ploughed back into the capitalist machine. Marx referred to this as ‘alienation’, since the workers were alienated from the end result of the production process — and not simply in terms of profit, but also in terms of working conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Any introduction to the thought of Karl Marx should, perhaps, begin with the concept of the ‘dialectic’. Dialectic was the term used by Marx and Engels to describe their theory of social change, which occurred, according to Marxist theory, as a result of class struggle. This conflict itself was a result of the social formations which emerged out of the forms of economic production prevalent in any given society. Society was envisaged as passing through several phases, designated by Marx, the ‘antique’, ‘feudal’ and ‘bourgeois’. In the bourgeois phase — the nineteenth century about which Marx and Engels were writing — it was the capitalist mode of production which prevailed. According to this system, the means of production (the factories, the land, the machines and so on) were owned and controlled by one class (the bourgeoisie), although that class depended on the labour of another class (the proletariat) to maintain production. However, the proletariat received very little of the profits of their labour, these instead being appropriated by the owners and ploughed back into the capitalist machine. Marx referred to this as ‘alienation’, since the workers were alienated from the end result of the production process — and not simply in terms of profit, but also in terms of working conditions.

Key concepts: Proletariat, Bourgeoisie, Marxist philosophy, Class conflict, Capitalist mode of production, Alienation, Dialectic, Neoclassical economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Agriculture and Anarchy: A Marxist Reading of ‘Snowed Up’ — Research Paper | ScholarLens